The Bear Hunt Debate Rages On
Hunting season under way despite strident protests from animal welfare groups
New Jersey's black bear hunting season is under way, infuriating animal rights activists who sought to prevent it from happening.
“This notorious 2nd bear hunt under Chris Christie, and the entire infrastructure of the New Jersey Division of Fish & Wildlife, and the Fish & Game Council, do not represent the 99% of NJ residents who abhor the very idea of killing any animal when non-lethal methods are available,” stated Merrilee Cichy, a representative of Keep Life In the Park (K.L.I.P.), in one of a series of protest letters to local news sites.
Though the APLNJ won the right to protest on Monday, the same day the hunt was scheduled to begin, they were powerless to stop it from happening.
Though NJ.com reported on Monday that public turnout was embarrassingly low (only four people showed up to protest according to the article, one of whom carried a sign that read, "Mother nature is crying") Clichy corrected that number in a note to Patch.
"I would say we had approx 25 for the protest yesterday. Some left around 4:30 and others came for the vigil which began at 6," she stated. Still, by midday, 21 bear carcasses had already been hauled into the weighing station. By day's end, 257 bruins had been killed.
Those numbers will undoubtedly grow into the hundreds as a total of 7,862 permits were issued to hunters this year, despite the fact that the state bear population is only estimated to be about 3,400.
This may seem like "overkill" in the purest sense, but proponents of the bear hunt insist they it's necessary for the safety of the human population. Killing several hundred bears per year keeps the bear count at a manageable level and decreases the possibility of dangerous encounters with humans, they say, while ensuring that the surviving bears will have enough food to last them through the winter.
According to NJBearHunt.com: “In the case of black bear hunts, scientific information gathered by the NJDF&W (Division of Fish & Wildlife) then confirmed by studies from East Stroudsburg University and based on actual, documented incidents reported directly by NJ citizens, the majority of NJ citizens understand the need for the culling of the black bear population to a level consistent with the safety of our human population.”
Activists feel differently. "The trophy and frenzied thrill-killing of our black bears has nothing to do with population control or public safety and everything to do with recruiting paying clients," retorted the Animal Protection League of NJ and the BEAR Group in a statement released Monday morning. In fact, the APLNJ and the Bear Education and Resource Group released a report Monday stating that "industry/agency partners" are marketing black bear hunt lotteries to recruit and retain hunters.
“The Bear Group” refuted claims that bears pose a threat to the human population. Moreover, its website claims the NJDF&W refuses to enforce garbage control and then blames bears for nuisance incidents to justify killing them. Measures such as proper garbage storage and bear-resistant trash cans can significantly reduce the number of bear-human interactions, the group says.
Last year, NBC New York reported that dozens of open trash cans were found in New Jersey townships near bear hunting areas, contradicting a report by the Department of Environmental Protection that said 99% of restaurants and stores to use bearproof Dumpsters.
In a New York Times article published yesterday, December 5, Animal Protection League executive director Angi Metler called New Jersey’s Fish and Game Council “a private hunting club masquerading as a state agency.” She was referring to the Gov. Christie's support of the hunt and the estimated 79% of state wildlife employees who are big game hunters.
Sport is what the bear hunt is really about, pure and simple, say the animal protection activists. Among the guidelines for hunters listed on the NJDF&W website:
Q) Can I shoot a female if it is with cubs?
A) Yes, you are encouraged to shoot the first black bear that presents you with a safe shot that will provide a quick clean kill. This is a management hunt and all year classes, male and female black bears are legal to harvest.
Q) Can I shoot a cub?
A) Yes, any sex or size black bear is legal to shoot.
Q) Can I chase a black bear out of a den or off of an open nest to shoot it?
A) No, black bear in dens or on an open nest are not legal to shoot and must be left undisturbed.
A 2010 statewide survey shows the 45% of New Jersey residents voters oppose the bear hunt vs. 35 percent who support it, while 74% of residents support nonlethal methods of solving human-bear conflicts. Public safety, they say, is only a smokescreen for the real game being played, namely "trophy hunting."
“In the 1970s our state’s bear population was virtually wiped out by trophy hunting, thanks to the pro-hunting stance of the New Jersey Division of Fish & Wildlife,” states the The Bear Group website.
Several Save NJ Bears protests and vigils will take place during this week's 6-day hunt.
DAYTIME: Monday through Friday, Dec 5 – 9
Franklin bear weigh station.
Daylight hours and the times will vary.
Call 732-446-6808 for information.
EVENING VIGILS: Monday through Friday, Dec 5 – 9
Franklin bear weigh station, 6pm - 7:30pm.
MAIN PROTEST: Saturday, December 10
12noon - 4pm
The public is invited to attend all events during the six days of protest.
Susan Kehoe
2:34 pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2011
BEAR HUNT - KILLING TINY CUBS - SEE PICTURES:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geDBa0XdPxc
H-l Rankin
2:37 pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2011
If you want to prove your marksmanship, go to a range. If you want to prove your stalking prowess, carry a camera. If you simply feel a need to make something DIE, you're no better than Ted Bundy or Charles Manson. Freaks.
Sunny Forrest
5:13 pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2011
I agree with you but you are wasting your breath on the Millburn/Short Hills Patch. The people of Millburn/Short Hills believe in killing animals they deem inconvenient. They support a deer slaughter every year.
JBBaker
7:11 pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2011
It's no wonder only four or five people showed up to protest since there are only a very few people that don't understand the need for a bear hunt. In spite of all of the press coverage the animal rights activists are not only in the minority but most people view them as foolish and lacking common sense. The comments in this article, and the article itself, prove the point.
Linda Federico-O'Murchu
10:53 pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2011
JB, I suggest you review the facts in the article, such as the poll that states how many NJ residents support vs. oppose the hunt, and the fact that a lot more people showed up at the protest than NJ.com originally reported. I also suggest you exercise civility in your comments.
M.Moore
6:18 am on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
@Linda, you called out JBBaker on his supposed lack of civility but you ignored Sunny Forrest's outrageous comment that the people of MSH believe in "killing animals they deem inconvenient". Is this an article or an opinion piece? Because your opinion is showing.
Hedley
1:39 am on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
25 people protesting versus 4 is hardly "a lot more." And the poll cited was performed for the Humane Society and used anything but neutral questioning. Do a quick Google search and anyone can find plenty of polls (some on Patch) most of which show that supporters of bear hunts far outweigh the opponents.
Sunny Forrest
10:24 am on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
As far as polls and numbers of protestors. Have you ever heard of the silent majority. Not everyone is able to go to protests or read on-line newspapers. They work and have families to attend to. Talk to people and you will see what people really think. I have lived in New Jersey all my life and know all types of people across socio-economic lines, democrats, republicans, old, young and the majority of people that I talk to (remember talking face to face versus computer to computer) are AGAINST the hunt.
I find that people who support it are uninformed and believe some of the skewed information that is put out by an organization that has a conflict of interest. You are naive if you think that a government agency that profits from hunters/hunting is not going to support a hunt. It puts money in their pockets.
M. Moore do you find my words more "outrageous" than the act of killing an animal? I guess you and I have different ideas of what should be considered outrageous.
Hedley
10:38 am on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
How do you know they are the majority if they are silent? Most who stay silent on any topic are generally the ones who really don't care either way. Maybe you should look up how legitimate polls are conducted. Has nothing to do with holding up a silly sign or reading on-line newspapers.
And quite frankly, I'd rather have the government make a little money than see a black bear walk into my backyard.
Sunny Forrest
12:45 pm on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Everyone has an opinion. If they are not asked, you will not know. It doesn't mean they don' care.
Do you think the Mason-Dixon Polling and Research Company is legitimate? They are the ones who conducted the poll in 2010 where only 35% support the hunt.
I am pretty sure you are safe from black bears in your neighborhood (but the government will always be happy to take your money).
M.Moore
10:44 am on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
@Sunny Forrest, yes in fact I do find your words more outrageous than the killing of an animal. I do not place animals above people - as you seem to be doing.
Sunny Forrest
11:00 am on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
To MMoore, "words more outrageous than killing"- in that case I find your words outrageous.
M.Moore
12:01 pm on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
I'm not surprised that you do, Sunny Forrest. Obviously you feel strongly about this issue, which is your right, but you seem to find it impossible to accept that people can disagree with you. And, that those who disagree are not horrible animal-haters who look to kill animals indiscriminately, but rather people who see the priorities involved both in the bear and deer hunts issue differently. So, there really is no point engaging in discussion with you, is there?
Lee Hollerbach
7:42 pm on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
I wish the bears were given guns to defend themselves from these hillbillies.
Hedley
9:35 pm on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
The bears would just use the guns to shoot the deer.
John Fonseca
9:10 pm on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
When we first moved here a few years ago I saw a black bear running across Baltusrol Way along Meadowbrook. I turned the corner to see where it was going and it ran into someone's back yard. This was around 7am on Sunday morning, so no one was outside. I pulled over and called MPD and a car arrived less than a minute later, since they were chasing it all morning.
So yeah, they are around and yeah, there is a history of them going into back yards. I saw it with my own eyes. They can do whatever the hell they want up in the reservation, up to and including listening to Lady Gaga, but keep 'em out of my habitat.
Sunny Forrest
6:56 am on Thursday, December 8, 2011
I am curious as to how a bear would get into Millburn, Essex County. How many suburban back yards did it go through before turning up on Baltusrol Way? Did it walk through Livingston, West Orange, Summit, Chatham? That is one stealthy bear. Or you could ask the experts, at the Division of Fish and Wildlife. Seems a little implausible that it could get there without a little help. Coincidentally just prior to a campaign to have another bear hunt. Hmmm.
I would never imply that any game hunters or the government agency that generates revenue from hunting permits would ever do anything immoral or underhanded to gain their end. There aren't any people like that in this state.
John Fonseca
9:39 am on Thursday, December 8, 2011
Mr./Ms. Forrest,
I have no idea how it got there. Based on the comment that the 2nd officer on the scene made, they'd been chasing it all morning and at this point it was only 7am.
If your statement is a circuitous way of calling me a liar, then good for you. I hope you're entertaining yourself, because I value your opinion of me at about the same level as what the proverbial bear does in the woods.
Also, you seem to think that this just happened, or that I made it up in time for this hunt. If you refer to my comment, I said it happened a few years ago. Four years, to be exact. And you know, I could care less what they do to the bears, so long as I don't see another one. They could slip 'em rufies and and dump them in your back yard for all I care. I'm sure you'd be very happy together.
Susan1
8:35 am on Thursday, December 8, 2011
If one of these bears attacked a resident, this conversation would change. Why does it always take a disaster for people to understand? I love animals and I wish there was an alternative to the hunt, but the reality is that the natural balance of things has been upset by people moving in and settling the land. Allowing lethal animals in our yards won't change that and I will always vote to protect my children over any animal, any day of the week.
Sunny Forrest
2:45 pm on Thursday, December 8, 2011
You are more likely to be attacked by a poodle in Millburn.
Hedley
3:05 pm on Thursday, December 8, 2011
Maybe we need to shoot poodles.