patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Updated: BOE Signs Off on Contract with Administrators

MEA says teachers not offered same terms; parties hope to reach agreement soon.

 

Updated 12/23: At a special meeting Wednesday night, the Millburn Board of Education voted to enter into a three-year contract with the school administrators in which the administrators would get a 2 percent raise each year for three years and a $2,000 one-time payment to offset medical expenses incurred because the district switched to a POS health care plan at the end of the last contract. 

The district and the teacher's union have still not come to an agreement, even after months of mediation, differing still on the issues of a salary increase, what percentage of the savings from the health plan should go to the teachers and how much of the additional out-of-pocket medical expenses should be paid to the teachers.

Board Member Mark Zucker read a lengthy statement outlining the history of the negotiations and the impasse that was reached last February.

"The board cannot have everything it wants. The teachers cannot have everything they want," Zucker said in a statement he read at the meeting. "I want to make one thing clear: The inability of the district and the teachers to come to terms is soley a reflection of fiscal reality and is not a commentary on our respect for the accomplishments of the teaching staff."

The vote to ratify the Administration contract was 8-1, with Jean Pasternak voting no, stating that she is concerned about agreeing to a contract before the district has a vision or strategic plan in place. The health benefits question passed 9-0.

"We are all anxious to eliminate the uncertainty caused by having our teachers and administrators working without an updated, current contract in place, but our decision as a board not only has to address the short-term uncertainty but also has to consider the long-term impact of the proposed contract on the district," Pasternak said in a prepared statement.  "It is unfortunate we are making this decision before we've developed the district's vision for the future of our schools. My ability to evaluate the impact on the district could not clearly be determined without that in place." 

Teachers have protested their lack of contract and were unhappy that the board changed their health insurance benefits away from the bargaining table, without negotiating or discussing it beforehand, said MEA president Lois Infanger.

The MEA filed an Unfair Practice Charge with the Public Employment Relations Commission, and both the administrators and the teachers have asked the board to provide benefits through the State Employees Health Benefit Plan instead of Oxford - a change Zucker said would save both teachers and the district thousands of dollars.

But the board had to meet and vote on the issue by Wednesday night in order to be able to make that change on April 1.

The teachers union has given the board a "final offer" and the board, during executive session on Wednesday, gave Zucker and the negotiations committee, which includes Board Member Sam Levy, the go-ahead to adjust its offer a little in an attempt to reach an agreement.

If none can be reached, the matter would go into a "fact finding" proceedings, which could take until April or later, he said.

MEA President Lois Infanger said that as far as health care is concerned, MEA has offered this option four years ago and earlier this year and in both cases, the board was not interested. And earlier this year, unilaterally changed the health care plan, causing the MEA to file the unfair practice charge.

"Health insurance is a subject for collective bargaining," Infanger said Thursday. "Last night, the BOE unilaterally changed the health insurance without negotiating."

Union representatives say it is rare for Millburn teachers to go this long - more than 160 days so far - without a contract, and the longer the negotiations  dragged on, the more teachers joined in the protests.

Both sides have said they would like to come to an agreement - orignally they wanted that to happen before the school year began and then said they had hoped to get it done by the end of the year.

Infanger said the terms of the administrator's contract were never offered to the MEA but hopes that the parties can reach a solution soon.

"The MEA continues to hope for and work toward a fair contract," Infanger said.

The economy has made it a difficult year for negotiations but, Zucker said, "the board obviously recognizes the district's acheivements and the contribution its employees have made to the district and continues to desire to find a way to put this whole situation behind us."

Regarding the administrators contract, Pasternak said, "I’ve heard in deliberations that we can afford the new MASA contract, but this assumes that nothing substantially changes in our educational system.  I question whether we want a school system where nothing changes.  The world is changing around us very quickly and we haven't determined how we want to position the district to meet those challenges."

MarkDS

5:56 am on Thursday, December 22, 2011

How can Ms. Pasternak expect employees to work without a contract just because the district doesn't have a "a vision or strategic plan". That process has not really even kicked off yet and is not expected to complete until next fall. The contract expired last June. It would not be fair to expect employees to wait that long to have a contract.

Reply
Comment_arrow

M.Moore

8:19 am on Thursday, December 22, 2011

It seems Ms. Pasternak focuses on the process and ignores the day-to-day deliverables that the district requires.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Laura Griffin

10:35 am on Thursday, December 22, 2011

Have updated the story with Jean Pasternak's comments.

Comment_arrow

Marty Wilson

6:11 pm on Thursday, December 22, 2011

over 60% (70% or more) of people don't have a contract for their job. why are these already entitled employees entitled to a contract. They can't be fired for crying out loud - what's the downside of not having a contract in place. Dude 1 - "Your fired, you don't have a contract in place." Teacher 1 - "Dude 1, you can't fire me - I'm a teacher, nice try dude 1.". Sorry MDS - I don't buy the 'it's not fair for the teachers to not have a contract' line.

M OKeef

8:05 am on Thursday, December 22, 2011

How does the Patch know what was discussed in a BOE executive session? I thought that was always stated as confidential?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Laura Griffin

10:37 am on Thursday, December 22, 2011

In his statement, Zucker explaine some of what happened in executive session.

Carolyn Most

9:11 am on Thursday, December 22, 2011

While I support the teachers, offering a new 3 year contract that includes a 2% annual increase on the overwhelming part of the budget (salaries are 80% or more I believe, anyone have the exact number?), when we have a 2% annual cap on revenues means the only option going forward is to continue to cut all non-salary expenses e.g. programs or cut teaches and increase class sizes. The question is what has to go to pay for this? And we don't have that answer. Opposing locking ourselves into a contract with these built in restrictions, when we have no operating vision or plan in place to manage the district going forward, let alone the impact this contract will have on school district's curriculum, operations, and financial viability is not only rational, it is consistent with Ms. Pasternak's position on fiscal responsibility.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JKH

9:51 am on Thursday, December 22, 2011

With all due respect, Ms. Most, that is just not very pragmatic...or realistic.

Comment_arrow

Marty Wilson

6:13 pm on Thursday, December 22, 2011

forget the operating vision, but we should rescind the tenure plan and get them to take a 5% per year salary cut. there are millions of qualified Americans who would gladly work for these perks and bennies. nobody is forcing these teachers to work.

Carolyn Most

4:09 pm on Thursday, December 22, 2011

JKH - I am curious as to why you believe it is not realistic to expect the district to have an operating vision and plan in place? And I have to correct an error in my comment, I read this as the teacher contract, but this is the contract with the Administration ... but can we offer the teachers less?

Reply
Comment_arrow

MarkDS

6:22 pm on Thursday, December 22, 2011

What is not realistic is to expect unionized employees to wait a year and a half to get a contract because the district is working on a strategic plan.

Comment_arrow

MadInNJ

11:06 pm on Thursday, December 22, 2011

The teachers have a contract, the old one . . . all the terms and conditions are still in full force. And when the new one is settled, they'll get whatever back pay they agree to. No reason for the district to strike a bad deal just so the teachers can have a new contract . . . it's all part of their negotiation strategy.

MarkDS

9:00 am on Friday, December 23, 2011

The teachers do seem to be being intransigent. There is more details in the Item story: http://www.northjersey.com/topstories/millburn-shorthills/136080803_Millburn_BOE_settles_with_administrators__teachers__contract_no_closer.html?c=y&page=2

Given the just announced state employee settlement and the settlement with the Millburn administrators the MEA should be THRILLED to accept a settlement equivalent to the one with the administrators (which appears to be what is being offered) rather than being angry and demanding an "increase multiple times greater than the increase proposed by the board". (Zucker's words in the Item story).

The MEA appears to still be as unreasonable and unwilling to deal with the reality of comparable settlements as they were at the start of the negotiations.

Reply

MillburnMike

1:43 pm on Friday, December 23, 2011

The BOE needs to continue to push for a contract that we can afford. MEA's last 3 year contract resulted in a generous salary increase during a time of deep recession, double-digit unemployment and cost cutting by the state. In addition, property taxes rose, property values fell, wages were stagnant and health care costs continued to skyrocket. The last contract needs to be seriously considered while negotiating the new contract - I can't see how a pay raise is warranted after what the taxpayers gave from 2008-2011. The MEA's demands are out of touch with the reality the rest of us are living in.

Reply

Leave a comment