Charter Schools: It's Decision Time
Will 'boutique' schools be approved? Department of Education to release new class of charters on Friday.
Millburn and nearby districts will learn on Friday the decision on two charter schools that would teach bilingual immersion, the state Department of Education said.
Sen. Richard Codey has called this new class of approvals “a watershed moment” in education as charter schools try to move into suburbs with high-performing school districts.
The state Department of Education has before it 55 applications for new charters, including the two Mandarin-immersion schools that would recruit students from Millburn and neighboring districts.
The decisions have been cloaked in secrecy. “They’ve been closed mouth about it, at least around me,” said Assemblywoman Mila Jasey (D-27th District) on Thursday.
Jasey has been leading efforts in Trenton to rewrite the state's 15-year-old statute governing charter schools.
“Charter schools are part of the public school landscape,” Jasey said, “but there is work to be done to define their role and how they’re going to interact with regular public schools.”
Rich Vespucci, a spokesman for the state Department of Education, confirmed that the decisions would be released on Friday. “We are still on track,” he said.
Livingston will be keeping an eye on two applications:
- Hanyu International Academy would serve students from Livingston, Millburn-Short Hills and West Orange school districts. It identifies an empty office park off Route 10 in Livingston as the school’s potential site, Regent Park.
- Hua Mei Charter would be housed in the St. Joseph’s RC Church on Prospect Avenue in Maplewood and draw students from South Orange-Maplewood, Millburn, Union, West Orange, and Livingston, the application says.
If approved, the schools would open in September 2012 for Grades K-2 and expand over time.
Tensions have been building over the pending decision for the past six months. Millburn and the other suburban school districts say these charter schools will drain money away from public schools already scrapping by. Proponents of school choice counter that charter schools are public schools and offer opportunities that the traditional schools are failing to address.
Both sides said they are anxiously awaiting the decision.
The decision ultimately falls to Acting Education Commissioner Christopher Cerf, who has attended numerous forums on this hot-button education issue. At a panel discussion last spring Cerf acknowledged that what he called “boutique” charter schools, such as those offering language immersion programs, might not be needed in suburban districts that are “humming along.”
“Hopefully Cerf will proceed in a measured way,” Jasey said. “He’s heard NJ voters and their concerns. I’m hoping whatever he decides reflects the concerns of voters.”
Those concerns have repeatedly been expressed at rallies and public meetings, including the financial impact to school districts, accountability and transparency.
“We do not expect the Department of Education to approve many or possibly any new suburban charter schools in order not to rile up the suburbs before the election,” said Julia Sass Rubin, a founder of Save our Schools, a grassroots group advocating for new charter schools law.
“However, until the charter law is reformed to bring New Jersey in line with the rest of the country by requiring local approval for new charters, communities will continue to have no control over their schools and their property taxes,” Rubin said on Thursday. “This issue isn't going away until our broken charter law is repaired."
Last week in Livingston, Rubin represented Save our Schools in a debate with Carlos Perez, president of the New Jersey Charter Schools Association.
Over the summer, the proposed schools were required to resubmit their financial statements and expand how they will assess academic success, according to addendas to their application posted on the Livingston Public Schools website. (See charter school information here).
If the charter schools are approved by the NJ Department of Education, the school districts would pick up 90 percent of the cost per student.
In other news related to charter schools, a New Jersey state senator has filed a legal challenge to force the Department of Education to turn over the names of volunteer reviewers who helped select new charter schools.
Sen. Nia Gill, (D-Essex) cited possible conflicts of interest in the approval process. The department must appear in Superior Court in Mercer County on Dec. 9 to answer the challenge.
According to NJ.com, state officials in January said more than a dozen volunteer reviewers read applications and gave non-binding recommendations on proposed charter schools.
Earlier this week, the state Senate approved a bill that would allow certain parochial and private schools to convert to charters. Few believe the proposal will lead to many conversions, but it may send a lifeline to at least a few closing Catholic schools, according to NJ Spotlight.
anna j.
5:39 pm on Thursday, September 29, 2011
What still isn't clear is why they would be allowed to build a house of worship on less than 3 acres of land. Can someone please clarify this. Why does it sound like it's only about the set back? They only have 1.8 acres. Thank you.
cris m. K.
10:22 am on Friday, September 30, 2011
I think you meant to leave this with the Chai Center article - but that was just a link to nj.com. Still a good question ... any answers?
Lunar
12:28 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011
What is not clear to me is why should a very small group be able to drain money from the public school system to fund their personal wishes. All of us like our children to learn things outside of regular school classes - and we pay for them ourselves. Should we all apply to open charter schools to cater to our personal wish lists?
Charter schools came in to existence to fill a gap where the public schools were not performing at a satisfactory standard. The idea of starting a charter school in an area where the existing public school is considered to be one of the finest in the state, is incomprehensible. And that too, to provide a language immersion environment, is even more bizarre. Add to the list the current economic difficulties and loss of language programs in the public school district and this whole sordid episode makes you wonder where all the sense is gone!
Save Our Schools NJ
1:18 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011
Whether a specific charter school proposed for your community is approved or denied by the NJ Commissioner of Education, the battle is not over until New Jersey's broken charter school law is reformed.
Many charter schools apply as many as four times before they are approved by the Commissioner and a new round of applications is beginning shortly.
Until New Jersey's charter law is reformed, the wishes of local communities will continue to be ignored.
Sign our petition and generate letters to your State Senator, NJ Senate President Steve Sweeney, and members of the NJ Senate Education Committee, letting them know that you want local control over the creation of new charter schools in your community!
http://www.change.org/petitions/new-jersey-communities-want-local-control-over-new-charter-schools-2
Susan1
3:00 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011
This is a good point. We need to see this through until the law makes it possible for communities to decide for themselves what they need.
Hedley
3:16 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011
Only 4 charters approved, none local. Victory for common sense.
http://www.nj.gov/education/news/2011/0930chart.htm
Laura Griffin
4:16 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011
We've got a story coming shortly. Check back soon!
Susan1
3:24 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011
This is GREAT news - at least for now. They will no doubt reapply. The legislature must act to protect our right to choose what we need in our local districts.