patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Flooding Top Issue in Township Committee Race

Candidates discuss flooding, parking, redeveloping and zoning issues at Forum, and agree that flooding must be town's top priority.

 

All the candidates for township committee agree on one thing – flood remediation is the top priority for Millburn-Short Hills.

Had Irene not flooded homes and businesses and caused the inadequate storm and sanitary sewer systems to back up on Aug. 28, then the other issues facing the township would be bigger, including parking, shared services, downtown redevelopment and planning and zoning issues.

But dealing with problems left in the township by Irene will be the biggest expense and issue for years to come, the candidates agreed at a debate Thursday night hosted by The Short Hills Association.

“As we’re all aware, it’s a grave situation in South Mountain," said Democratic Candidate Stephen Thomas. "We are going to have to spend a lot of money to improve the sewer system there. …Our budget doesn’t have a lot of wiggle room and we’re going to feel it. We need to sit back and take a long, hard look at what we’re spending money on.”

Deputy Mayor and incumbent Robert Tillotson told the crowd at the debate that finding solutions to help alleviate flooding is already the top priority of the Township Committee, which is working hard in various avenues from finding regional solutions to planning for drainage projects in the South Mountain area now.

“We are getting a lot done,” he said. "The hurricane and flood damage and sewer damage is priority No. 1.”

Democrat Seth Levine said he worked on the committee that formed in the wake of Hurricane Floyd to address he same issues and he felt that the Township Committee did not adequately address the situation back then.

“The township chose a parochial fix without engaging towns up and down the river,” Levine said. “...This is not an issue that can be done by Milburn Township alone. It has to be addressed from up river to the ocean. And, yes, it is probably the single largest priority now because it wasn’t done effectively earlier.”

Republican Sari Greenberg agreed that that issue must be the town’s focus, but, she said, she would not “trash talk” the committee.

“That’s not why I’m here,” she said. “The recent Hurricane Irene was a very polarizing issue, obviously.

“It’s critical we that we implement a comprehensive program [to deal with recovery] and not do it in a vacuum. There are multiple moving parts and not all the parts are going to move in unison,” Greenberg said. “Dealing with it is an  absolute priority.”

The four candidates are vying for two open seats on the committee, which is predominantly Republican.

The Democratic challengers say they do not think that township committee members did a good job responding in the immediate days following Irene but that they are taking positive steps in the right direction now.

Tillotson disagreed with the sentiment that township committee members were slow to respond – saying that committee members walked the neighborhood, contacted state and federal officials and called for hearings into Jersey Central Power & Light’s lack of response.

“I know there's this feeling that our Township Committee didn’t do something beforehand or didn’t do anything afterward,” he said. “It’s priority No. 1, and the Township Committee has exhibited that behavior since the day of the storm."

Despite the fact that the flooding issue takes precedence, during the debate, the candidates also touched on other issues such as parking, redevelopment, traffic and zoning issues such as Stop & Shop on the border of Springfield and the Tutor Time property development on the Livingston border.

In the case of the Tutor Time property, they all said they would diligently watch what was happening and do whatever they could to lessen the impact the development on the neighborhood, but what happens is largely up to Livingston.

On the Stop & Shop property, which is in Springfield but would have driveway access on Millburn Avenue, creating even heavier traffic in that area, the candidates they would do everything they could to make it difficult for the store get access to Millburn avenue.

However, both Levine and Thomas said they also don’t think a vacant building sitting there is good for the neighborhood either.

As far as parking and revitalization are concerned, all agreed that the parking deck was needed but Levine and Thomas felt it should have happened 15 years ago when the township first considered it, and thought that it should also be planned keeping redevelopment in mind.

Tillotson, who won his first township committee seat on a campaign against a major revitalization plan, said a redevelopment plan should be something taxpayers want and approve of.

Greenberg said any downtown plan should be also done in consideration of The Mall at Short Hills and should not compete with it. Additionally, she said, much of the revitalization efforts should made by the Downtown Millburn Development Alliance and by businesses.

Members of The Short Hills Assocation were please with the large turnout and said it shows how important the race is. The election is Tuesday, Nov. 8.

The Candidates at a Glance (in alphabetical order):

Sari Greenberg, a Short Hills Republican who grew up in West Caldwell, has lived in the township since 2000 and has children in the schools.  After 15 years as general counsel with NBC Universal, she took a buyout and is spending more time with her family and in her community. She’s running, she says, to give back to the community that has given so much to her and her family.

Seth Levine, a telecommunications consultant and Democrat, has lived in the Wyoming area for 21 years. His children graduated from Millburn High School, and he has long been active in civic organizations and is a regular attendee at Committee meetings.  He says he is running because he feels he can help the township use its tax dollars more efficiently and effectively.

Stephen Thomas, a Democrat who used to work in publishing and now is a property manager, has lived in Millburn since 1994. His children are in High School, and he has been active in civic life, including coaching Little League and being on the town's parking committee. He is running to change what he calls the dismissive way the committee deals with the public and to ask the tough questions.

Incumbent and Deputy Mayor Robert Tillotson, a Republican, has a finance background and has lived in Short Hills more than 15 years and has two sons who graduated from Millburn High School. He has been on the Committee for one term and is running for re-election because, he says, the committee is making progress on issues like parking and flooding and he said he wants to see that through.

MarkDS

2:33 pm on Friday, October 28, 2011

I can not believe that Mr. Levine is still pushing a huge out-of-character development in downtown. That type of talk is scary.

Mr. Thomas seems to have an open mind, which is a good thing, Looks like he would bring some independence to the Committee. I am leaning in his direction.

Mr. Tillotson is certainly knowledgeable but I think he is too quick to jump on the parking deck and is too stubborn with not properly considering alternatives.

Ms. Greenberg seems to be there just to fill a Republican spot and not cause any trouble.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen V. Thomas

9:22 am on Saturday, October 29, 2011

MarkDS--Okay, you're leaning toward me....so, I mean, what on earth do I need to do to solidify your support? Walk your dog?

SH Resident

2:51 pm on Friday, October 28, 2011

Mr. Levine provided a 100,000 foot vision of downtown development -- "a place where we can go to dine, shop, or have fun." Unfortunately, he came up short in two important areas. First, even when asked, he was short on detail. I am interested in knowing: (i) how he proposes to make it happen; (ii) how will the character of the downtown change; (iii) what types of stores does he envision on attracting to the area; (iv) how the mall would react to competition. Second, he provided no detail on how the downtown megaplex (my word, not his) would be financed. Of course, he cautioned the attendees to view all changes to the downtown through a "fifty-year" lens so I am concerned with how much this would cost.

Reply

mollyb

7:31 pm on Friday, October 28, 2011

I felt the best line came by Mr. Thomas when he said something to the effect, "If asking tough questions (of the Township Committee) is considered irresponsible, then I'm as irresponsible as they come."

Reply

JWP

11:05 pm on Saturday, October 29, 2011

mollyb: Mr Thomas' sound byte was indeed Clint Eastwood-like. However, taken in context with his other statements, I wonder how truly effective he might be as a member of the town council. The context of this quote was Mr Thomas discussing how he would handle town business, as opposed to Mr Tillotson. Momembts before, Mr Tillotson stated it would be inappropriate to comment on a matter being presently litigated. Mr. Thomas chided Mr Tillotson for that comment -- and then went into a rant about openness, his being fearless about asking the tough questions, and his willingness to be in your face and ask questions. The statement was ironic in that Mr Thomas spent the entire night commenting on how he felt that the committee lacked a sense of decorum / professionalism. Rather then actively engaging in discussions and voicing opposing positions, will Mr Thomas be ineffective because of his biting comments; his juvenile humor [see the silly comment above from Mr Thomas about 'walking your dog,'], etc.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JGB

11:33 pm on Saturday, October 29, 2011

@mollyb

The town has chosen quite properly chosen not to comment publicly on a pending lawsuit. It is truly irresponsible to try the case in the media or in a public forum. It would be misfeasance for any member of an administration to engage in such an action. Steve Thomas does not appear ready to occupy a seat on the committee (or is it council).

Comment_arrow

mollyb

10:09 am on Sunday, October 30, 2011

I was present at the debate and don't recall hearing/seeing a "rant." I am tired of politicians who give pat, flat responses that leave one wondering if they ever answered the question at all. Or worse yet, ones that believe the "looking back," as Ms. Greenberg said, was a waste of time. If we can't look back and learn from our mistakes, then we can never move forward effectively. IMHO, that was her polite way of saying, "I will never question the actions of my fellow Republicans on the committee." To me, that's just cowardly hogwash and simply something Thomas won't be afraid to do. Also, I read Mr. Thomas' quip above as jocular, not juvenile, but it's clear we may have a different sense of humor.

Stephen V. Thomas

10:10 am on Sunday, October 30, 2011

JWP and JGB-- Apparently, we can agree to disagree. While it may be appropriate for the committee members not to comment on pending litigation, I don't for a minute think it's irresponsible or unreasonable for people to wonder how it is we as residents are now in the position of footing the bill for at least two costly court cases. Moreover, I am not commenting on litigation, I am simply asking questions about cases I've read about in the Item and on Patch. To wit, in his deposition, Township Administrator Tim Gordon admitted he ignored two warnings, one verbal, one written, notifying him and the town that the house adjacent to Old Short Hills Park did not conform to laws. Asked what he did in response to these communications, Gordon said, and I'm citing directly from an NJ.com story (http://www.northjersey.com/news/104059119_Administrator_sat_on_Green_Acres_warning.html) , was 'I didn't do anything.'

In addition, I do not agree whatsoever with the comment that I've been in any way disrespectful in how I've conducted myself either before the Committee or as a candidate. I have registered my displeasure and disagreements forthrightly and directly. Nor have I said anything publicly that I haven't expressed to each of the members of the committee personally.

Reply

bluemartha80

7:06 pm on Sunday, October 30, 2011

At the debate the other night it was very clear that Stephen Thomas possesses the intellectualism necessary to be elected to the position that he is seeking.Mr Thomas also came across as real and genuine.He was aware of the issues and truly wants to make our community a better place to live in.

In this current political climate it is refreshing to see someone who is willing to ask the tough questions yet at the same time be able to poke some fun at himself.

Until Recently Herman Cain was ignored by his Republican brethren Than his poll numbers started to climb and he now has a bulls-eye on his back.I see a similar scenario developing here with Mr. Thomas.

Reply

Leave a comment