patching...
Breaking: Pair Drove Utility Vehicle on Train Tracks, Cops Say »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

POLL: Should Children Be Able To Use Facebook?

The social-networking site is apparently mulling over the idea.

 

 

Facebook is developing technology that would allow those under the age of 13 to access the site under parental supervision, a move that could help bring in a sea of new users for revenue but that could also increase privacy concerns, according to a report in Monday's Wall Street Journal.

The technology being tested would allow children's accounts to be tied to their parents' accounts so that parents would decide whom their children could "friend." New kid-friendly features also could allow Facebook and its partners to bill parents for games and other entertainment accessed by their kids.

Currently Facebook bans those under the age of 13.

But several studies show that many kids use Facebook despite the ban, often with their parents' consent.

For example, a 2011 Consumer Reports survey discovered that 7.5 million people younger than 13 already use the site.

As a result, some argue that the ban should be removed so that adults could work more openly with their children on the issue of social networking.

Technology journalist Larry Magid wrote in The Huffington Post that: "Whether we like it or not, millions of children are using Facebook, and since there doesn't seem to be a universally effective way to get them off the service, the best and safest strategy would be to provide younger children with a safe, secure and private experience that allows them to interact with verified friends and family members without having to lie about their age."

But many have criticized the idea of lifting the ban.

Common Sense Media, an advocacy group, compared Facebook to "Big Tobacco."

"With the growing concerns and pressure around Facebook's business model, the company appears to be doing whatever it takes to identify new revenue streams and short-term corporate profits to impress spooked shareholders," the group's CEO, James Steyer, said in a statement.

"But here's the most important issue: There is absolutely no proof of any meaningful social or educational value of Facebook for children under 13. Indeed, there are very legitimate concerns about privacy as well as the impact on the social, emotional and cognitive development of children. What Facebook is proposing is similar to the strategies used by Big Tobacco in appealing to young people—try to hook kids early, build your brand, and you have a customer for life.

"What's next? Facebook for toddlers?"

No doubt parents and their kids have endured many a heated discussion over Facebook in recent years as the site has grown in popularity.

Earlier this year, a YouTube video was created by an angry father who, when fixing his daughter’s computer, came across her long Facebook rant about family life. He was so mad about her post that he spilled his own rant, which he promised to post on his daughter's Facebook wall. For his grand finale, the dad pulled out a gun and shot his daughter's laptop to pieces.

The YouTube video became an instant sensation.

What do you think? Take our poll and tell us what you think in the comments section below.

  • Should Those Under 13 Be Allowed To Use Facebook?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Absolutely not. What's next ... Facebook for toddlers?
        525 (59%)
    • Yes. Many kids already use Facebook anyway.
        318 (36%)
    • Not sure. Need to think about it.
        40 (4%)
    Total votes: 883
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Opinion

DXJ

4:38 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

I don't think FB is appropriate for users generally as the CEO is a souless amoral man-boy who will sell your data and personal thoughts for a profit. The Zuk showed complete lack of regard for investors during the IPO. He'll be under pressure now more than ever to justify the massively over inflated stock price, so user beware.

Reply

Wayne's World

4:43 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

I laughed at the recent story that FB is mentioned in 1/3 of all 2011 divorce petitions. FB is nothing but trouble...just so you can see what your ex(es) are up to?

Reply

AL DESTEFANO

4:04 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

HI
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY THERE ARE NO STORIES ABOUT
THE GREAT BASEBALL TEAM OF MAHWAH HIGH SOHOOL
WITH A RECORD 22 AND 6. I AM SURE OUR TOWN OF MAHWAH
WOULD LOVE TO SEE MORE STORIES ABOUT THIS TEAM
AND OTHER TOWN SPORTS.

THANKS AL A SPORTS FAN

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hank

11:16 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

they should post it on facebbok

Comment_arrow

myrents2damhigh

4:21 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

i am still following basketball and hockey. Gimme a break.

BeachBum

5:03 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

FB is a place where people who dont get attention go to brag and tell everybody what they are doing every minute of every hour of their pathetic day - Most kids just post pictures and chat with their friends, so its fine, but email is a better way for kids or IM

Reply

LB

5:51 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

FB is an easy out for people who like to say they have friends and pretend they have relationships with others. A push of a button and click of a key can never replace hearing a friend's voice and having a real relationship.

Reply

Gary Rabinowitz

5:56 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Child predators, perverts and various & sundry sickos "likes" this update......

@ Wayne's World - the statistic you correctly cited is the only thing a mature adult needs to know about Facebook. There is nothing good or true that Facebook can't destroy -- privacy, dignity, marriages, parent-child relationships, peaceful quiet, proper human communication. There are other alarming facts about FB and how it wrecks marriages in this article -- http://blogs.smartmoney.com/advice/2012/05/21/does-facebook-wreck-marriages/

Reply

FLResident98

6:06 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

No, I don't think the ban should be lifted. Truthfully, I question if 13 year olds are emotionally ready for the pitfalls of social media.
As for the parents who allow their children under the age of 13 to use it, well, if they are comfortable teaching their children that it is okay to lie as long as you think it is harmless entertainment then I suppose that is their decision to make.

Reply

McGruff SafeGuard

6:18 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

If you are looking for full parental control that monitors & controls everything kids do online (including Facebook) , as well as blocks inappropriate websites, and does linguistic analysis to watch out for dangerous behavior -
such as internet predators or cyberbullys -
check out McGruff SafeGuard's Parental Control system:
http://www.GoMcgruff.com

You may remember McGruff “The Crime Dog” - Take A Bite Out of Crime - from your own childhood

For FREE iPad/iPhone parental control, check out http://www.GoMcGruff.com/browser

Reply
Comment_arrow

Journey

6:58 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

More worst first thinking.

I was online back in 1982 when I was twelve. Granted there are way more people online now. If I can get my daughter online before she enters the rebellious stage I could teach her the foundational skills neede to take care of herself.

But she is only three now and this well all have to do with when we think she is emotionally ready and responsible enough. That happens at a different age for everyone, in fact there are folks my age that I would not trust online.

Comment_arrow

Rory Chadwick

9:15 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

We now know Journey is 42, and I thought all this time Journey was 28. Kids under 13 need not be on Facebook. Facebook sucks people in and if adults are on Facebook an average of what seems like 4 hours a day then kids will never go out and play ever again if they have Facebook. Maybe if Facebook had a 30 minute a day limit for kids to abide by then i might feel different. I know if Chris Hansen saw this story on patch he would sit down at his computer wearing a fugly turtleneck and cheap blazer and say something like "I need to tell you something, I'm Chris Hansen and this idea is not good. If you have anything else to say, we'd love to hear it and if not, you're free to go"

Comment_arrow

Journey

9:07 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

I get nagged by my mom to check facebook, it is where my cousins, aunts and uncles all post info. I rarely go on it. I'm don't even turn on my computer on weekends if I can help it.

Right now the 3 year old is into Wii Fit (the grown up version and the Nick Jr version), she won't let me play the Nick Jr with her anymore, its for kids...

I wholeheartedly agree that kids need to be outside. I think one of the reasons kids are not out as much is parents are afraid to let their kids out of their sight in. How many 10 year-olds are allowed to go to the park by themselves? How many 10 year olds want to go with mom?

es

9:03 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

@Journey The only "online" that existed in 1982 were dial-up modem BBS and Compuserve, and you were rich if you could afford anything faster than a 300 baud modem (in modern terms, 1/100,000th of 4G speed).

Reply
Comment_arrow

Journey

9:01 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

We had a 300 baud modem, a print out list of the telephone exchanges we could call without getting a big bill and host of BBS to go to. My favorite was The Eastern C= Board. I knew the SysOps, they were in the South Jersey Computer Users Club with my dad. I cut my computer teeth on a Vic20.

FourScore

9:28 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Perhaps this poll should be named; "should Facebook regulate your child's internet usage so you don't have to bother to do so yourself".

Reply

Jessica Ashley

10:36 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

My sister is under thirteen with a facebook and was such a bad choice for my parents to allow. She spends a ridiculous amount of time on mindless games, kids need to stimulated in another way besides the Internet.

Reply

Ricky

3:18 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

The internet is laced with web owners who mislead those using their sites. I had a twitter account and posted for several months straight but decided to give it up. I haven't made a single twitter post on my own profile or any other on that site in four years. I still get those email alerts every week that so and so is now following you on twitter.

Reply

Nose Wayne

8:02 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Have a Beautiful Park in my neighborhood. To bad no kids go to it anymore. Only mothers with little kids I see there now, They get out of the house because their other kids are on Facebook all the time!!

Reply

Nose Wayne

8:04 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Jessica,Could not have said it any better,SO TRUE!!

Reply

Joe Loonam

8:40 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

This is a non issue. Whether or not Facebook allows it is irrelevant. It is up to parents to be parents.

Reply

Leon Wiser

9:15 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Sounds no different than attempting to legalize prostitution or drugs in the hopes of making it safer. To those parents with children under 13 that let them get a Facebook account, I agree that you are teaching your kids that it is OK to lie. There are reasons why kids are restricted at different ages from activities they haven't learn to handle yet--should we give an 18 year old a bottle of booze to celebrate or should he/she wait to their 21st b-day when its actually legal? There is no educational, emotional, social, or any developmental value in a child having a FB account. Last weekend we saw a "parent" (I use the term loosely) who took her 3 kids (under 13) to a very violent movie that ended at 1:00a.m. Do people have any common sense anymore?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom G.

11:49 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

At least the movie was keeping them out of trouble. That's better than parents that let their kids hang out on street corners until all hours of the night. That's a recipe for trouble.

Comment_arrow

William Mays

4:51 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Hoboken Owl, not to be mean, but if you saw a PG-13 movie for the first time when you were 13, you parents must have really been hell to live with. People take kids to restaurants at night because its SELFISH to go out and stuff yourself while your kids are stuck at home. I don't know about your neighborhood, but my car hasn't ever been dented by anyone when it was parked on the street. It actually got vandalized in my driveway once. Thats when I installed gates and started parking the car in the garage.

Donna Colucci

10:01 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

That's so funny you say this Leon...I was just talking about this this morning. Instead of all the "fixes" organizations are pushing, ex. dieting, anti-bullying, etc ..., how about basic parenting skills for some who are in desperate need of it. Oh wait that might hurt someone's feelings.

Reply

Prentiss Gray

11:06 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

I have to disagree with a lot of the commenters here. Facebook and other social media are here to stay, our children need to learn to use them wisely. This is an opportunity for parents to guide choices made on Facebook, get involved and not just let them out on their own. It's a powerful medium, great for those who are careful and use it with some forethought, but it can have some very unpleasant consequences for those who don't.

I too saw a child of no more than 5 or 6 at Snow White, not good (and yes it's not a great work of art). One of my boys were encouraged to see a train safety movie in Morris Plains when he was that age and he didn't sleep for a week. A huge error on my part, I assumed the train exhibit workers would take kid's ages into account.

Reply
Comment_arrow

EC

11:21 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I could not agree more. I for one have my facebook completely strapped down in privacy settings so only people I give my actually facebook address to can find it. I only add people I actually know in real life and mainly use it to keep in touch with friends from high school and college.

If we (in general) were to keep children's accounts locked down like I do and restrict their account to family and perhaps friends from school, I see little issue. As long as parents are doing their job and supervising their child on the site (like they should be doing for ANY internet usage at that age), there is no reason for a child to avoid one of the best ways to keep in touch with friends or family who live far away!

the old book

11:10 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

when i was a freshman in college facebook first came out.- it WAS a great tool. the majority of your friends were people on your campus, you could arrange groups around classes you shared with other student and discuss the class in facebook groups. it was also a great way to hear about campus events or social events. or meet people with similiar hobbies or set up clubs. not too mention helped me out with a couple coeds.
status's and wall posts were not as risky because they were only seen by your peers (people the same age and probably similiar senses of humor).
once they opened it up to people high schoolers and older poeple it was ruined

Reply

Tom G.

11:57 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

The problem with FB is that it brings out the voyeuristic and obsessive-compulsive instincts in people. I know so many people that "friend" others just to see what they are up to, and usually these are people they hardly even know. I looked over my cousin's shoulder one day as she was looking through wedding photos on FB. I asked who that was and she replied "I don't know". If a stranger walked up to you with a stack of photos and asked you to look at them you would think they are crazy. But as soon as someone (anyone) puts photos online, they suddenly, somehow become interesting. Very odd behavior.

I had a FB account for about a year before cancelling it, and I have found that I am overall happier by not getting constant updates about what everyone else is doing. There are much better things I can be doing with my time.

Reply

Frank LeRose

12:29 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

I think the answers should have included a choice about under thirteens being allowed with strict parental control. Children need to be taught right from wrong. keeping them from Facebook does nothing to prepare them for the inevitability of their using the system. I'll always remember an interview with Nadia Comenici where she said her trainers never taught her how to eat properly...they just withheld food. When she stopped competing, she blew up like a balloon and took years to learn how to take care of herself....it was traumatizing for her. I think we need to trust our kids and take care of them...not keep them in bubbles and then throw them to the wolves. Besides...most people on Facebook are NOT wolves!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Journey

1:34 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

I agree Frank, people learn through experiencing. You gain no experience when you are sheltered in a nice safe bubble.

How to you learn what people to trust online or off line. Research has shown that teaching children about Stranger Danger has not made any off them much safer. I'm teaching my daughter to not go anywhere with someone without talking to us first, even someone she knows (a family friend went off her meds when I was in grade school and tried to collect me and another girl at school, she thought we was in danger.) Most abductions are not committed by strangers, so it is important to teach children offline/online situational awareness, and to trust themselves that if something doesn't seem right, to act accordingly.

Comment_arrow

William Mays

4:45 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

I agree with Journey, up until when I was in college, my parents always knew where I was going and who I was hanging out with.

Comment_arrow

EC

11:26 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Interesting but not surprising fact about Nadia Comenici. Very well said, I agree. Not quite the same but similar... My parents would let me have a tiny glass of wine at dinner on special occasions and have a beer or a mixed drink when i was in middle school and such. Because drinking was never a big deal in our house, I was never into the 'party scene' in high school or even college. If I DID go to a party, I knew my limits and was really safe about it because I knew my parents would rather I call them and say "hey, I had a drink and it was too much, can you pick me up". I feel the same way about facebook. If we "hide" it and make it taboo for the younger kids all they will want to do is jump right in and do OMGASMUCHASPOSSIBLE right away when they turn 13 and can make their own account. I know I babbled a bit and I'm sorry but I hope you understand what I was trying to get across!

myrents2damhigh

4:26 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Short the stock. It's going down and no bottom seen in the near future. They want 12 year old kids to join. Things are getting real desperate. Privacy? There is no telling what this desperate company that changes privacy rules as it sees fit to make money will do. I would not trust these marketeers as far as I can pick up a truck and throw it.

Reply

Nose Wayne

11:54 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

R-E-S-P-E-C-T, Teach your kids!! If they don't NOSE, they will not learn. Starting kids today in pre-school with computers.Teach them what is appropreate and what is not. Spend time with your kids,they grow up to fast.They are only as good as what you teach them.As for Facebook, MO MONEY,MO MONEY,MO MONEY!!!

Reply

Barry Black

11:46 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Facebook is the fruit of the poisonous tree----the more you ban it, the more people want it. Anybody can get a FB account all you need is a name and a email address.

Reply

Steve Sternberg

2:32 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I think the media vastly overstates the usage and impact of social media. No real reason for kids under 13 to go on, but if you do let your kid on, just make sure they friend you and you know their password, and you can check on them anytime you want. Facebook is actually better and safer than other sites. But everyone should just keep in mind that despite press accounts, the average Facebook user only spends 13 minutes per day on the site (Twitter users only spend about 4 minutes per day on the site).

Reply
Comment_arrow

Journey

5:00 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I would rather do what my parents did with me, foster trust and respect. The trusted me, respected me, and I in return. I told them about the first time I had alcohol, willingly, I brought up the subject. We talked about responsible drinking. I was 18.

If your kid respects and trusts you, they will turn to your for advice and guidance.

If you snoop on your child, they will feel untrusted, and they will in return, not trust you.

When we get my daughter a cellphone in the future, we will enable some type GPS tracking, on all of our phones. We can check to see where she is, she can check to see where we are. Why, in case of an real emergency, not to invade each others privacy.

EC

8:33 am on Monday, June 11, 2012

I for one have my facebook completely strapped down with privacy settings so only people I give my actually facebook address to can find it. I only add people I know in real life and mainly use it to keep in touch with friends from high school and college.

If we (in general) were to keep children's accounts locked down like I do and restrict their account to family and perhaps friends from school, I see little issue. As long as parents are doing their job and supervising their child on the site (like they should be doing for ANY internet usage at that age), there is no reason for a child to avoid one of the best ways to keep in touch with friends or family who live far away!

Reply

Ridgewood Dad

9:44 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012

Honestly you're all just wasting your time. Kids are going to make facebooks if they want to, and there isn't much you can do other than not allow it at home in your vision. Good luck with the online arguing though, I'm sure it's productive.

Reply

Leave a comment