Private vs. Public School? NJ Spotlight Map Pinpoints Numbers
Use a new interactive map to plot percentage of students attending private school.
Private vs. public school? With an average tuition of about $20,000, that's the million dollar question for parents considering the extra cost. What’s been their answer? A new interactive map created by NJ Spotlight shows the percentage of kids attending private schools across New Jersey. (See the map here)
To find out how many students in your community are attending private school, simply click on a municipality. You'll see the total number of children in grades K-12, along with breakdowns of the percentages of children going to public and private schools in three categories - kindergarten, elementary, and high school -- as well as the totals.
The U.S. Census Bureau estimates attendance in public and private schools as part of the American Community Survey. Statewide, the data shows that 12.3 percent of all students attend private schools.
West Orange attendance in private schools is higher than the average at 19.4 percent. A look at other Essex County communities finds Millburn with 15.6 percent of its students going to private schools - rising to 24.8 percent for private high school.
Continue reading and use the map @ NJ Spotlight Interactive Map.
A sampling of Essex County towns above the state average include:
West Orange
Total students: 8,038
Pct. to private school: 19.4
Pct. to public school: 80.6
Pct. to public kindergarten: 71.6
Pct. to private kindergarten: 28.4
Pct. to public elementary: 83.5
Pct. to private elementary: 16.5
Pct. to public HS: 76.6
Pct. to private HS: 23.4
Cedar Grove
Total students: 2,114
Pct. to private school: 16.4
Pct. to public school: 83.6
Pct. to public kindergarten: 88.8
Pct. to private kindergarten: 11.2
Pct. to public elementary: 85.7
Pct. to private elementary: 14.3
Pct. to public HS: 79.3
Pct. to private HS: 20.7
Millburn
Total students: 5,024
Pct. to private school: 15.6
Pct. to public school: 84.4
Pct. to public kindergarten: 81.8
Pct. to private kindergarten: 18.2
Pct. to public elementary: 89.6
Pct. to private elementary: 10.4
Pct. to public HS: 75.2
Pct. to private HS: 24.8
Bloomfield
Total students: 6,864
Pct. to private school: 15.0
Pct. to public school: 85.0
Pct. to public kindergarten: 85.0
Pct. to private kindergarten: 15.0
Pct. to public elementary: 85.1
Pct. to private elementary: 14.9
Pct. to public HS: 84.8
Pct. to private HS: 15.2
South Orange
Total students: 2,459
Pct. to private school: 14.3
Pct. to public school: 85.7
Pct. to public kindergarten: 85.2
Pct. to private kindergarten: 14.8
Pct. to public elementary: 83.5
Pct. to private elementary: 16.5
Pct. to public HS: 89.9
Pct. to private HS: 10.1
Belleville
Total students: 5,375
Pct. to private school: 13.8
Pct. to public school: 86.2
Pct. to public kindergarten: 88.4
Pct. to private kindergarten: 11.6
Pct. to public elementary: 87.0
Pct. to private elementary: 13.0
Pct. to public HS: 84.6
Pct. to private HS: 15.4
Livingston
Total students: 5,899
Pct. to private school: 12.9
Pct. to public school: 87.1
Pct. to public kindergarten: 90.4
Pct. to private kindergarten: 9.6
Pct. to public elementary: 89.3
Pct. to private elementary: 10.7
Pct. to public HS: 82.2
Pct. to private HS: 17.8
A sampling of towns below the state average include:
Verona
Total students: 2,034
Pct. to private school: 6.3
Pct. to public school: 93.7
Pct. to public kindergarten: 100.0
Pct. to private kindergarten: 0.0
Pct. to public elementary: 94.2
Pct. to private elementary: 5.8
Pct. to public HS: 90.5
Pct. to private HS: 9.5
Newark
Total students: 50,830
Pct. to private school: 9.9
Pct. to public school: 90.1
Pct. to public kindergarten: 91.4
Pct. to private kindergarten: 8.6
Pct. to public elementary: 90.1
Pct. to private elementary: 9.9
Pct. to public HS: 89.7
Pct. to private HS: 10.3
Maplewood
Total students: 4,797
Pct. to private school: 10.0
Pct. to public school: 90.0
Pct. to public kindergarten: 84.7
Pct. to private kindergarten: 15.3
Pct. to public elementary: 91.6
Pct. to private elementary: 8.4
Pct. to public HS: 87.7
Pct. to private HS: 12.3
West Caldwell
Total students: 1,794
Pct. to private school: 10.0
Pct. to public school: 90.0
Pct. to public kindergarten: 81.2
Pct. to private kindergarten: 18.8
Pct. to public elementary: 94.6
Pct. to private elementary: 5.4
Pct. to public HS: 82.6
Pct. to private HS: 17.4
Montclair
Total students: 7,766
Pct. to private school: 11.8
Pct. to public school: 88.2
Pct. to public kindergarten: 94.5
Pct. to private kindergarten: 5.5
Pct. to public elementary: 88.9
Pct. to private elementary: 11.1
Pct. to public HS: 85.2
Pct. to private HS: 14.8
Caldwell
Total students: 1,161
Pct. to private school: 12.1
Pct. to public school: 87.9
Pct. to public kindergarten: 74.1
Pct. to private kindergarten: 25.9
Pct. to public elementary: 91.2
Pct. to private elementary: 8.8
Pct. to public HS: 92.3
Pct. to private HS: 7.7
wohopeful
10:46 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
Of the surrounding communities West Orange has the highest percentage of students attending private educational institutions. WO is certainly not the wealthiest of the surrounding communities, must be a statement on the quality of the public education system in West Orange.
Gary Englert
11:47 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
@ wohopeful: Leave it to you to place some negative spin on anything concerning West Orange. Absent from your acknowledgement, however, is the following:
1. West Orange has a significant Orthodox Jewish population and is also home to the Solomon Schecter-Golda Ochs Academy (K-12) that enrolls many of its children, as do the Kutschner Academy in Livingston.
2. Also within our borders is Seton Hall Prep which draws more of it students from West Orange than any other community.
Factor in those anomolies and you have all the explanation that's need...which has nothing to do with the quality of our schools.
Louise Gray
1:46 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
It IS a statement on the quality of the education. Don't kid yourself.
Lisa
3:07 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
So are the college acceptances which are rolling in for our WOHS seniors. They are being accepted to the best colleges. Our valedictorian is going to Princeton, others are going to U of Penn, Yale, Northeastern to name a few. The list this year is very long and very impressive. I am proud that my children attend the West Orange Public School system and believe they will truly benefit from the education they received here.
woskeptic
3:54 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
I went to Northeastern - it's not so great!
I'm sure the very top kids got into great schools, but what percentage of WOHS students get into the top tier? That tells the true story. I'm glad your children did well, but I bet there are many who can't say the same.
20yearmiller
7:35 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Don't know when you went there but it's not the same school it was 15-20 years ago. It has reinvented itself. One thing never discussed in regard to Ivy and "top tier" schools is legacy. Many parents in wealthy communities went to UPenn, Yale, etc. and have an easier path being accepted to these schools. Many do earn it on their own and I have the utmost respect for them. How do you thing George W. Bush got into Yale being an average student at best? Legacy. It's not always the very best students getting into the top schools. MHS had an unusually high number of kids kids go to UPenn. Quite a few have unbelievable test scores, and quite a few have parents who went to, you guessed it, UPenn.
sgyaft
7:19 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
I only support public schools. My son attended in a blue collar town just out outside of Boston years ago and received a 1st class education. A majority of seniors graduating there all attended college, many in very very presitigious institutions. I attended a public school in Santa Fe, NM (decades ago) as a minority at the time (I'm caucasion) and the schools were excellent there as well.
Noreen Brunini
7:40 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Curious where these numbers came from? The actual 2010 census? Let's look at some basic Math using Millburn as the example. Reported in the above article 5024 students in Millburn with 15.6% attending Private schools - or 784 students. which leaves 4,240 attending the public school. The only thing is in 2010 Millburn School District reported an enrollment of 4,941 students or 701 students more than accounted for in the above reported census? It looks like there is something wrong. Do other towns numbers jive with their Districts 2010 enrollments?
Noreen Brunini
8:11 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Take this info with a grain of salt. It is not facts, rather is based on faulty assumptions and estimated projections NOT factual census responses. To quote from the original article: "The U.S. Census Bureau estimates attendance in public and private schools......." and "The data is an average of enrollment patterns for 2006 through 2010." It had already been known in Millburn that these demographic projections based on averaging assumptions of enrollment from trending the 2000 census forward for the end of the decade are seriously wrong compared to the reality in our own town which grew much higher than average from 2000 to 2010. This would be really interesting information if it were based upon facts, not estimates.
woskeptic
10:35 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
@ sgyaft - My tax dollars support public schools...certainly not all private schools are created equal and the same goes for public. You can't say all public schools are great. There's irrefutable data that there is a major problem with our educational institutions in this country. Watch Waiting for Superman. That will give you a better picture. I also speak from experience...I went to a public school in an affluent town (not in NJ) and I can tell you I had some majorly bad experiences, from unenthusiastic and apathetic teachers, to bullying. Oh, but wait...yep, certainly our school had it's fair share of Ivy League bound students. Doesn't count for much when a huge percentage was falling through the cracks. I basically graduated high school almost math illiterate. Yet I went to Northeastern. What does that say for the public school I attended or Northeastern for that matter?
sgyaft
7:27 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I'm all for fixing school performance in bad schools etc., and it is possible. I believe in keeping school dollars for public schools. There are reasonable remedies to bring failing schools or teachers up to the standard necessary for a good public education. As for Watching Superman, I did. I also researched the film some more and it really wasn't a true representation. Much of it was a selected setup of stuations to try to prove the film maker's agenda. It most certainly did not represent the reality of the vast majority similar neighborhood/city schools that exists.
Tom G.
8:51 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
When kids go to private school it doesn't automatically mean they are great students and want to get away for a better education. I grew up in a wealthy district (outside of NJ) in one of the top school districts in the state. Parents often pulled their kids out of the public schools because the kid was having behavioral problems and the parents wanted them away from their friends who were a distraction. So they would send them to a couple of the different catholic schools nearby. These schools were certainly not better than the public schools and often lacked funding. This resulted in less or outdated technology, outdate textbooks, etc. So all private schools are certainly not created equal.
I read recently that a lot of students that used to attend private schools are now coming back to the public schools, primarily because of the economy and parents not wanting to spend the extra money on a private education. And as the cost of college tution continues to steadily rise, I wouldn't be surprised if that leads more parents to put their kids in public schools that may have otherwise gone to private school.
woskeptic
11:43 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I would spend my last dollar and sacrifice as much as possible to pay for my children's education if I thought private school was the best option for them. I wouldn't pull them just to save a buck.
Lisa
9:23 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I think we should all look at this report and take it with a grain of salt. Parents send their children to schools based upon many different reasons ie religious affiliation being one of the biggest.
What makes me proudest about my school district is not how many kids get into top tier schools (although there are many) but how many kids who may have never even thought about going to college are not pursuing higher education as a result of their experience in high school.
Lisa
10:18 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
oops, what i meant to say is that kids who may have never even thought about going to college are now pursuing higher education as a result of their experience in high school
Cynthia Cumming
11:15 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Gary is right. I would think that the majority of private school attendees in West Orange go there due to religious belief, over the belief that the public schools are inferior.
woskeptic
11:50 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I feel they are inferior. Actually, let me clarify: the one my family is zoned for is inferior. Some of the elementary schools in W.O. are probably decent. But definitely not all.
Also, it's not necessarily just an educational issue. If there's no discipline in the schools, that's a huge disruption in class time. I know of several kids who have complained of being bullied. Not to say private schools don't have incidences, but they get a handle on the problem quickly and are more aware of the interactions between the kids.
Cynthia Cumming
12:59 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
How do you know?
woskeptic
10:51 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
My children play with the kids in our neighborhood and a few were talking about various bullying they encountered. Also, I see how the kids behave on the playground. I've also heard parents complaining about various issues.
woskeptic
11:08 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Or if you're asking how do I know issues are addressed quickly in private school - my kids attend private school. I attended public schools and I can tell you stories of tortured kids where no one intervened. I also have friends who have kids in public schools and it seems as if it's the same story as in the past.
That's not to say private schools are the be all/end all. But perhaps due to the class sizes, the fact that the parents are paying tuition, or whatnot, there is much less of that kind of behavior and when it does occur, it's addressed immediately. That has been my observation thus far.
Cynthia Cumming
11:26 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
No... I was asking how you can determine that your zoned school is inferior. Cursory encounters and heresay are not dependable sources.
woskeptic
11:40 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I based my decision on what I observed with my own eyes of how the kids were behaving as well as upon a meeting with the principal when I asked basic questions about the school when I first moved here. The principal was beyond rude and nasty and clearly didn't want to be bothered with my inquiries.
I also made my decision when I visited the private school and was met with courtesy as well as my observations when I looked in on classes where the children were engaged and attentive and seemed respectful and happy.
I had an open mind, but was taken aback by what I saw in the particular school we are zoned for. Since then, I have had my opinions reinforced by what I stated above. I don't think that would be considered cursory. But how would you recommend assessing a school? Ignore what you've seen, and see if your kids sink or swim? I'm not going to put my kids in public school just to be PC.
Cynthia Cumming
11:44 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Parents can put their children in whatever school they deem best. You are entitled to your opinion on the public school in your 'zone'. For many parents, they don't have that option. The more a public school can do to address its challenges and connect with its community, the better. It sounds like you had a bad experience. While not in the majority, it shouldn't have happened, if it happened the way you say.
Gary Englert
11:56 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
What's most troubling to me (or at least reason for my own skepticism) is that, more often than not, those who speak well of our public school system (or most anything else) have no problem putting a name, face and reputation behind their opinions...while those expressing criticism tend to do so from behind psuedonyms.
Not Gary Englert
9:38 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@Gary, the screen name rant is getting old... Every. Single. Time. You. Comment.
It's the internet.
Gary Englert
12:06 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
@ Not Gary Englert: While imitation is said to be the sincerest form of flattery, I'm neither amused nor flattered by your screen name.
Yes, Skippy, this is the Internet but, anyone entering a debate anywhere should be mindful that source identification and verification is central to the gravitas of any argument.
If the point is only to spout nonsense, then there is no point.
woskeptic
12:12 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
@cynthia cumming: it did happen that way! I'm not making up a story. I was treated disdainfully by the principal. I also have seen things by the children; aggressive behavior, cursing at adults, throwing objects, etc! Granted this is on the playground and not in the building itself (as far as I know) but I can tell you, you won't hear that outside at the private school my children attend. At least not so blatantly!
@ gary englert: As for "hiding" behind a pseudonym...I am merely being private (no pun intended) because I do not want to offend my neighbors who have chosen to put their children in that particular public school. That is their choice and each parent has to know their own child/children well enough to know whether that will work for them. Or, perhaps they don't have a choice, and I wouldn't want them to feel like their kids are in a bad place. Although I have heard them complain about the school and talk about various issues. But again, my children play with their children and I don't want there to be repercussions if someone can't handle my opinion.
I'm not only protecting my privacy, but you'll notice I haven't named the particular principal or elementary school I've been discussing. I am not hiding by any means. Merely trying to have a discourse without malice.
Gary Englert
12:33 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
@ woskeptic: Your experience and opinion might be 100% valid but, neither verifying nor having any good come from it will never happen so long as it's given anonymously. Having graduated from the public schools and having maintained involvement as a volunteer and scholarship administrator for more than forty years, I have ample reason to know the challenges they face and to think well of them. A wonderful education is available to any child that wants on in the West Orange Public Schools and our best students can compete (and do) with any in the country. It is a given that acquiring a good education requires a motivated student who will also benefit from having involved and supportive parents. Our public schools are truly a reflection of our greater society and exposing our children to it (warts and all) is invaluable in itself.
Adam Kraemer
7:09 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
The statistic were about 1 in 5 West Orange students are not in the public schools for educational or theological reasons speaks volumes for the need for educational reform and education funding reform.
Gary Englert
1:02 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
@ Adam Kraemer: Every comment you make, regardles of the subject, is with a broad stroke of the brush, sans any specifics and says essentially nothing.
Historically, the number of West Orange children attending other than the public schools has been more or less constant as the number of combined available seats in other institutions has been more or less constant. The primary reason for kids going to them being parents wishing their children to have a religious component to their educations.
Such options have risen and fallen (though not necessarily the total desks available)over the years with the closings of some schools (Our Lady of the Valley, Our Lady of Lourdes, Essex Catholic, East Orange Catholic) and the opening of others (Solomon Schechter-Golda Ochs Academy, Kutschner Academy).
Traditionally, some number of our school aged children had always attended the former (in addition to Marylawn, Our Lady of the Lake, St. Thomas, Montclair Kimberly, Newark Academy, St. Benedict, St. Joseph and Seton Hall Prep) with our Orthodox Jewish community primarily sending their children to the latter, for the last 25 years.
A detailed analysis is likely to show that the number of students matriculating in private and parochial schools has been more or less constant over time, and represented an even higher percentage of the total school aged children (circa 1975 - 1995), when there was a dramatic (albeit temporary) decrease in the population of the public schools.
Lindsay
11:54 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
speaks volumes? So according to that chart where 25% of Millburn kids go to private high school, and only 75% attend the number ONE school in the state, does Millburn too need edu reform?
Gary Englert
12:08 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
@ Lindsay: Expecting Mr. Kraemer to respond to any comment or observation that suggests just how wrong he might be is wishful thinking.
MP
9:02 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
WOSKEPTIC - West Orange has good schools and teachers. The problem is some schools are failing, like Washington elementary school. This is in the recent NJ school report card published in Star Ledger. You can also check it out on the web. Schools like St. Cloud, Gregory and Roosevelt are comparable even to Millburn and Livingston schools for Language Arts NJASK scores (for advanced proficiency). They are behind those schools in math advanced proficiency score mainly because those schools have more motivated children and supportive parents. Edison was a failing middle school and to improve the average score, the BOE brought in students from all over the town to that school. They call this failed experiment Central Six. They only managed to drag down good students.
MP
9:03 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
WOSKEPTIC- Continued from previuos reply--- To keep motivated children and parents in West Orange (and to keep our home prices high), they need to operate magnate or charter schools (not mandarin school for God's sake!) to pool the best students into these schools. Forget about self-esteem. Currently, just to keep the self-esteem of 60% of the students, they are dragging down the other 40%. As a minimum, they should put all good students in one class so that they can learn in a competitive environment with no discipline problem. WOHS tries to put good students in AP classes to separate them from bad ones, but the kids cannot take too many AP classes before getting burned out. They should pool them in one class to avoid any contact with disruptive students.
Students who are not motivated can continue to fail without affecting others. This may sound harsh, but some parents have no interest in the education of their children. Even the best teachers cannot educate the kids who are not motivated and parents who don't care. It is not the low income, but the motivational level that makes the difference. The best students in Newark come from Asian parents. You may argue these kids come from broken family, etc. Then put all these kids in one school so that they can attend to their need in a slow environment without affecting the other kids.
Cynthia Cumming
9:38 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Adam, you know as well as I do that the preponderance of parents sending their kids to private school in West Orange are for religious reasons.
MP, I am not sure how you can call EMS 'failing' ... when overall parent and kid experience their is so overwhelmingly positive, grade and personal wise. You seem like an intelligent person. Do you understand the whole AYP and NCLB requirements that cause a school to 'fail'? Check the statistics in Millburn, Livingston and other towns... they failed AYP this year too. And at the high school, AP and honors students do very well. Have you heard about the IMS school?
woskeptic
8:35 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
@Gary Englert: You are obviously proud of the public schools, but maybe if you could listen more to what people are posting instead of being so defensive, you could help address the issues at hand. All you want to say is: Rah, Rah, public school. Don't you think there are problems that need solving? Why not take a more charitable view toward the reasons people are posting. It's not necessarily to disparage, but to point out what they find troubling in some of the public schools. If you look at how the U.S. is competing among students worldwide, you would see that we are no longer at the top of our game.
Gary Englert
8:42 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ woskeptic: As a graduate of the West Orange public schools (whose dhildren also matriculated there) who has maintained a life-long involvement with them (as a PTA member, administrator of two scholarship programs and member of the Accreditation for Growth Committee at WOHS), not only do I have some pride in them, I'm actually in a position to know something about them.
Put any group of human beings together and challenges and problems will undoubtedly ensue and public education (in general) and the West Orange public schools (in particular) is certainly no exception.
Far from being defensive about much of anything, what I am (first and foremost) is a realist: I have a healthy skepticism of anything posted anonymously on an Internet message for or anywhere else for that matter.
Excuse me for being brutally frank but, pusillanimity is not a character trait that most people hold in very high esteem.
If you'd like a fair hearing of your opinions on any subject and some dialogue of substance to ensue, you'll put a name, face and reputation behind them.
(To be continued...)
Gary Englert
8:55 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
All that said, you then stated:
"If you look at how the U.S. is competing among students worldwide, you would see that we are no longer at the top of our game."
This has long become an old bromide bandied about by those looking to substantiate their displeasure with some aspect of public education and simply fails to acknowledge the simple fact that we (are as much if not more so than any time in our hiistory) a country of immigrants that faces educational challenges unique to any country you might care to compare us to.
Do you think, for one minute, that the children making up the typical first grade classroom in China, Japan or Sweden bears the slightest resemblance to one in virtually any part of the United States?
I can assure you that it doesn't.
Adam Kraemer
6:54 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
My three children are in the West Orange Public Schools. The West Orange Public Schools do many good things. For the most part the teachers do a good job. However, we have issues and those issue are real. The cost to the taxpayer is significant more than it should be. The test scores are not as they should be. We do good things for high achiever and great thing for special education. However the educational program for vast middle tier of students is not working nearly as well as it should. Yes, theology is a major reason as to why a significant part of West Orange is opting out of the public schools but it is not the only reason. We can't just go rah-rah ya school and sweep the need for educational reform pedagogically and fiscally under the rug. Conversely slamming the public schools as being wrong at every turn would be counter productive and unfair. We need to keep what is good with the public schools good and improve what needs to be improved starting with how we treat and teach the vast middle tier of students.
Gary Englert
9:00 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ Adam Kraemer: As with all things, pointing out problems is the easy part; formulating solutions is far more difficult.
In your case, you've always been rather long on the former and short on the latter.
I'd opine that is because you don't know and understand the terrain well enough to even begin trying to negotiate it.
Mark Paulson
8:13 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
When will people start to understand that the issues being discussed with our schools comes from the makeup of our town. 25 percent of our students only have one parent at home. A large percentage of our students have parents who do not speak English. Other towns have a greater percentage of parents with college degrees, two parents at home, and high paying jobs which enables parents to hire private tutors for their children. West Orange has amazing schools but the demographics of our town are different than the towns with higher test scores. Students are able to get a wonderful education in West Orange. We just need to make sure that the schools are safe and conducive for learning. It is also important to mention that the West Orange school district prepares students for the real world. The world is full of people with many different backgrounds. Students don't get to experience that in some of the other towns in their perfect and secluded environments.
Lisa
9:29 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
I couldn't agree more Mark. I just had a discussion with a friend of mine from a neighboring town which is considerably less diverse that WO. She is very concerned that she is raising her children in a bubble and that when it comes to the real world she is concerned which is why she has her children become involved in activities in communities that are not so homogeneous.
As a parent of a chiild going off to college in fall I have no such concerns given the education they have received in WO.
Gary Englert
9:48 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
How does the world view an education in the United States? Rather well, actually...so we must be doing something right!
U.S. higher education has climbed out of its post-9/11 international enrollment dip and attracts more foreign students than any other country — a record 691,000 in 2010, up from 475,000 in 2000, with the increase driven by an upsurge in Chinese undergraduates.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/education/international-students-pay-top-dollar-at-us-colleges.html
MP
10:32 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
GE- You are mixng public schools (k-12) with colleges. The top tier US colleges are the best in the world for research (MS/PhD level) where as UK/French universities offer tough curriculum for undergraduates, particularly in engineering. A lot of professors in our colleges are nowadays foreign born. What does that say about the motivation of our students to become professors! US public schools are a lot better than UK public schools. In UK, public schools are run by counties I believe and they also lack funding. They don't pay $12k a year in taxes to support the public schools. A lot of people there send their kids to private schools. Our public schools are not bad, but what we need is tenure reform and change in curriculum. We tend to teach more social studies than math and English it seems.
Gary Englert
10:55 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ MP: I'm not mixing/confusing anything.
I am simply recognizing that colleges and universities are essentially the pinnacle of the nation's educational establishment and, as such, suggest that much can be said for the foundation on which they've been built.
The United Kingdom and France (with +/- 60 Million people inhabiting each) are 1/5th our size.
We surely have colleges and universities with academic rigor in specific disciplines equal to any found in either country.
Since you specifically mentioned engineering, please note that the US News & World Report rankings indicate that 17 of the 25 best engineering schools in the world are in the United States.
http://www.usnews.com/education/worlds-best-universities-rankings/best-universities-mechanical-aeronautical-manufacturing-engineering
An influx of foreign students (to attened the best universities on the planet) will undoubtedly result in some percentage staying to pursue teaching/research positions.
That, in and of itself, should not suggest that American students aren't vying for them, as well.
Can what we have be made better?
Of course...what can't?
MP
11:31 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
If 25 percent of our students have only one parent, how are they able to afford our high taxes. Are they all living in apartments?
Gary Englert
11:56 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ MP: I'm not sure where that 25% figure came from but, the US Census suggests otherwise, counting 804 single female parents with children and 203 single male parents with children.
That's a total of 1,007 households and is significantly less than 25% of the 15,135 households identified (in West Orange) during the last census.
http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_09_3YR_DP3YR2&prodType=table
Mark Paulson
12:47 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
The figure is actually a bit higher in case you question it. With the divorce rate at nearly 50 percent, this is a serious problem that will only continue to get worse. The number of unwed mothers raising kids in this town is staggering. The living conditions of several children in this town is very sad. Kids go without food. They share bedrooms. Hundreds live with their grandparents. This isn't Beverly Hills. The living conditions stink for many children which is very unfortunate. Perhaps you should inquire at a soup kitchen or food bank to see how many kids are unable to eat 3 meals a day. Do you think that might have anything to do with their test scores???????????
Mark Paulson
12:51 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
How clueless is this question? Do you think that these people pay taxes? They are on welfare and praying to God that they can come up with $600 to pay the rent for their one room apartment. Good grief. There are thousands of poor children in this town. Towns with better test scores don't know what that is.
Gary Englert
1:12 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ Mark Paulson: Anecdotal information aside, the most recent US Census is the most complete data available on the subject.
In general, do we agree that the public school population is not truly representative of the socio-economic demographic of the community as a whole?
Yes...given that +/- 30% of the school aged children qualify for federally susbidized lunch programs, that's a given.
The bigger issue, so far as school performance (standardized testing) is concerned, would be cultural and the very large percentage of households where English is not spoken and the number of different languages that are.
Gary Englert
2:22 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ Mark Paulson: BTW...you'd be hard pressed to find a one-bedroom apartment in West Orange for under $1,000 a month; $600 just isn't happening. It's also a given that (unless the landlord is a complete moron) a renter pays a proportionate share of the parcel's property tax assessement, based on the space her/she is living in.
http://www.apartments.com/apartments/New%20Jersey/West%20Orange/?frontdoor=google&cmp=GMSA&O_PK=apartments%20in%20west%20orange%20NJ&gclid=COXI9fy_ka4CFYeK4AodRFA7hw
woskeptic
11:55 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
MP and Adam Kraemer: You are right on the money with your comments. I can't understand why Mr. Englert is completely blinded to any need for educational reform in W.O. or in the U.S. as a whole. There are myriad of examples of how our schools are failing. But let me clarify: I never said ALL the WO schools were bad. The one that my kids would have attended did not impress me, and my husband (who is a first generation American and who grew up in a tough neighborhood in NYC) was especially adamant that we send our kids to private school. We tried to be open-minded and we chose to live in WO for its diversity, but many of the comments by MP and Mr Kraemer are exactly some of the problems we saw. You have some excellent students and you have some good programs for kids who are doing poorly and then you have the majority who get lumped together or dragged down by unmotivated, disruptive kids.
A stereotype about private school is that they are in a bubble. The school my kids attend is VERY diverse. My children have friends from all races and economic backgrounds. They interact with the surrounding communities. My children are mixed race and the idea that they are sheltered from the rest of the world is absurd. But when they are in school, they are there to learn. If private school affords them a better atmosphere for focusing, if there is more discipline, and they are being challenged, then that's right - I'm all for private school!
Gary Englert
12:21 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ woskeptic: Nothing I have posted in any way, shape, manner or form, should lead anyone to believe that I think there is no room for improvement of our public schools.
My issue here is, purely and simply, is one of credibility.
I am simply unwilling to accept (on face value) observations and criticism of our public schools from (1) someone with no children matriculating in them, and (2) lacking enough courage of conviction to offer their opinion other than anonymously.
woskeptic
11:57 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
One additional comment: don't think that if kids are attending religious schools it's purely because the parents want their kids to have that religious component. Sometimes it's because those schools are more affordable than let's say MKA or some other high-end private school.
Gary Englert
12:11 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ woskeptic: Your very subjective and anonymous opinion aside, it IS a documentasble fact that the greatest single reasons parent place their children in schools with a religious affiliation IS precisely because of the religious compenent.
Affordability (versus other private schools) is well down the list.
The research and resulting date is out there; seek and ye' shall find.
woskeptic
12:11 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Mr. Englert: due to my poor public school education I had to look up pusillanimity.
I have the right to remain private in regard to my identity. No amount of verbal taunting from you will force me to reveal my identity. You want to discount my comments just because I wish to remain private that's your choice. I feel that others are taking my comments for what they are: a concern for the education of the children in our area. The outcome of how children are educated affects society as a whole. Whether you have children or not. They are the future. So I care very much about all the educational offerings available to them. Whether it's public, private, after school enrichment, camp, etc.
As for my credentials: I'm a parent. That's all that's required for me to use my voice in regard to this topic. I call it as I see it. If that offends you, you need to ask yourself why you want to spout only positive numbers and not acknowledge what many others are also posting about their concerns.
woskeptic
12:35 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Mr. Englert: why do you feel the need to insult me? I haven't called you any names so why do you insist on calling me a coward? Would seeing a pretty picture of me help you find my comments more credible? What benefit would my picture, and full name do for you in regard to my comments? I told you that I'm a parent. I'm not an attorney. I don't have special credentials. So why do you need my name and picture for me to back up what I'm saying? Would that help you hunt me down? You want my phone number and address???
Gary Englert
12:49 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ woskeptic: If you consider my accurately identifying your utilizing a screen for being what it is an insult...then perhaps you shouldn't be using one.
I have no desire to hunt you down or chat with you on the phone but, your comments concerning an unamed school in an unamed neighborhood and passing on hearsay from unamed neighbors doesn't give anyone an opportunity to intelligently address a single concern you've raised...does it?
My providing my name gives people an opportunity (if they so wish) to do whatever verification they'd like to convince themselves (or not) that I'm a real human being, with some standing in the community, who may well know what he's talking about.
An anonymous poster?
Not so much.
woskeptic
12:38 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Mr. Englert: Furthermore: I pay taxes and I am a resident of WO. My husband and I made a decision to opt for private school. Now ask yourself why we would want to pay exorbitant taxes AND still pay tuition. Are we just fools? Or do you think we saw something we didn't like?
Gary Englert
1:32 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ woskeptic: If you really read and abord the content of my posts, you'll see that I'm a big believer in scientific method and do some measured anaylsis of information put before me.
Not knowing either your or your husband, or where you live, I can't opine about what "something (you) saw that (you) didn't like" or whether or not you are fools.
I do know that an excellent education is available, in the West Orange public schools, to any motivated child that wants one and that there is no substitute for parental involvement and encouragement in achieving that goal.
Still, like it or not, we all have strengths and weaknesses, aptitudes and inabilities, and the very nature of education will surely reveal some of each in the children who are subjected to it.
Not everyone is destined to be the valedictorian, the football team's quarterback or even attend college, as much as we'd like to hope otherwise.
woskeptic
1:25 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Mr. Englert: You have completely reinforced my decision for private school. You are combative and unwilling to listen to my comments. I experienced the same combativeness with the principal at HAZEL elementary. Does that clue you in on my neighborhood? Does that help you? The principal has since moved on. Gee...I wonder why? Apparently many parents had issues with her. Verify that! Your goal is to win an argument. When you say, hearsay from unnamed neighbors...what if they don't appreciate my repeating what they said in a private conversation? What kind of standing do I need in the community? I can give you my name and you can verify that I am indeed a WO resident. I have no arrest record. Is that the kind of standing in the community you're talking about? What does this have to do with people pointing out issues about schools? You write: I'm a real human being. Who do you think is writing this...a fake human being? I don't get you? You harp on ridiculous aspects of what my name is. Since I chose NOT to send my kids to HAZEL, what difference does my name make???? I do NOT get what you are fixated on! Does standing in the community mean I take care of my property? That we aren't behind on our mortgage? Again, I am trying to point out PERCEPTION about the local school. If you want people to be drawn to this area, I think you might want to consider my comments.
woskeptic
1:29 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Because if some perspective home buyer asks me what I think about my local school, I will be sure to give them my OPINION. You can sit there and be smug and right as rain, but it's not going to change how people are PERCEIVING the area. Do you see the difference? No, I don't actually KNOW what goes on inside HAZEL. But I see plenty of bad behavior and believe me, kids are influenced by their peers. You are deluded if you don't think so. There have been drug busts on the Hazel playground. Go look up the police reports! There was a shooting near the school. Look it up! Not an environment for my kids. But thank you for your enthusiasm about the WO school system. I'll pass.
Gary Englert
2:26 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ woskeptic: Again, the more information one provides about themselves, or a given situation, the more cogent a response one can give...and one's "standing in the community" generally refers to one's level of civic involvement
I am very familiar with Hazel Avenue School, know the prinicpal (Mr. Acevedo) and, in fact, gave a presentation to a very well behaved 5th grade, concerning Veterans Day, last November. Mr. Acevedo's predecessor (who you aparently had some issues with) was generally well regarded and was not dismissed; she retired.
My children also attended Hazel Avenue School and my wife was the President of its PTA. Having owned homes on both Hillside Avenue and Colony Court for a combined 20 years, I know the neighborhood exceedingly well.
Crime is everywhere and, the two you mention happen to be isolated incidents which (more specifically) had nothing specifically to do with Hazel Avenue School itself, or even grade shool children. Either incident could have just as well happened in front of your home or in your backyard and neither points to Hazel as being Dodge City or inherently unsafe. An active community group (Valley Community Watch) also functions in and around that neighborhood.
Your allegation concerning "illegal students" is nothing more than anecdotal and one that I've heard for the 50 years I've lived in West Orange. It has also been proven to be largely false via two rigorous re-registration initiatives conducted over the last decade.
Lisa
9:58 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
woskeptic, I am sorry for your experience with Hazel. I do not know when you visisted or which principal you met with, but they have a new principal there who is wonderful and is trulymaking an effort to reach out to the community. I have several family members who attend that school (who also have the means to send their kids to private schools) and are very happy there.
Again, it is your right to send your children wherever you want but to characterize the school as a failing school becuase of incidents in the neighborhood is wrong. Mr. Acevedo is doing a wonderful job and my family members have had a truly wonderful experience there.
woskeptic
1:46 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
One last comment: are you also not aware that a lot of the poor kids who come to school in WO are not residing in WO? They use the names and addresses of relatives who reside here. And you can look that up too!
Gary Englert
2:31 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ woskeptic: And finally, you said:
"Because if some perspective home buyer asks me what I think about my local school, I will be sure to give them my OPINION.'
Earlier, you had asked if I thought you were a fool and declined to comment lacking hard evidence one way or the other.
Well, now you've certainly provided some.
If you hope your property will appreciate in value, you'd do well not to denigrate the public schools to prospective buyers in your neighborhood, as nothing could be more foolish or detrimental to the cause.
Michelle Cadeau
2:39 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
woskeptic, do you have kids in the WO school system? If you do you might remember that we all had to re-register all the students in 2010. They do that on a regular basis and the kids that are caught not living here will not be allowed to go to school here.
Gary Englert
2:48 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ Michelle Cadeau: Apparently Mrs. woskeptic sees the presentation of fact as being combative and believes that unsubstantiated and unattributed opinions should be embraced and acted upon..
Cynthia Cumming
2:54 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
If anyone knows a non West Orange resident attending our schools, they should report them to the BOE so that they can be investigated.
woskeptic
3:58 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
No, by all means,don't act on anything anyone has said. It's all "anecdotal". I have neighbors who have said things to me regarding the school. That carries weight with me. I have seen a girl crying because other girls kept taunting her by calling her white girl. But, hey, it's all good.
As for being foolish - I prefer to be foolish but honest. If someone asked me about Hazel, I would tell them my kids don't go there. I would also let them know they aren't zoned for Gregory. Because I've been to many Open Houses where the realtor lists that as the school. Now why do you think that is? I still have my house listing when we bought our house. It says GREGORY school! Blatant lie!!!
Michelle Cadeau
4:13 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Well that is not right if the realtors are lying. However, I have about 5 friends with kids at Hazel and they all swear by the school and the staff. The families are all great, involved families as well. I am a firm believer that it is not only the school you are in but more so the support you get from home that makes you succeed.
woskeptic
4:04 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
If my family could get out - we would. There have been multiple robberies on my street. My neighbor across from me was robbed while she and her child were sleeping upstairs!!! But Mr. "Lived here for 50 years" thinks we're in paradise. No one can sell their homes, and don't tell me our school is a big draw. Wake up!!
Gary Englert
4:25 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ woskeptic: "Mr. Lived here for 50 years" has and has a more than realistic world view than you obviously do.
Your hypocrisy is also astounding: on one hand, you choose to post under a psuedonym to safeguard yourself and so as not to upset your neighbors yet, on the other hand, you're posting defamatory nonsense about your neighborhood and its school that is surely injurious to yourself and your neighbors as well!
Golly gee...on second thought, no wonder you post under a psuedonym!!!
If your a real estate agent listed the wrong school in the listing, that's on them. If you bought the house based on that or any other misinformation, the lack of due diligence (mounting evidence of foolishness?) is on you.
As to anyone's inability to quickly sell their home, welcome to the economic climate of the second decade of the 21st Century; you are not alone.
One can't help but wonder how long you've lived here and from whence you came.
The anecdotal information I most recently referred to was concerning the "illegal student" charge, which I know to be unsubstantiated nonsense.
As to any child being teased and taunted?
It happens to the best of us at one time or another and is a pretty common experience in most everyone's life...sad but, far from insurmountable.
Lisa
10:03 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Woskeptic,
As I stated above, several family members live in your neighborhood. They address any challenges through the Valley Community Watch and have been very involved in addressing any issues in the area. They choose to stand up and be proactive both in the schools and the neighborhood. Why don't you reach out to Valley Community Watch and bring your concerns up to them. Get involved, be a positive force for change! You may like it. You live in a wonderful neighborhood, close-knit. There are block parties, weekly street get togethers. It is up to you.
woskeptic
4:09 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
The ONLY thing good I can find is that I happen to have kind, and caring neighbors. So that makes our being stuck, bearable.
I'm glad I didn't give you my name Mr. Englert - you'd organize a mob to throw things at my house.
Enjoy the pristine world you live in. You should probably run for mayor. I'd vote for you. You have ALL the answers!
Gary Englert
4:38 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ woskeptic: I don't have all the answers but, I now do have some insight why a grade school principal might have lost patience with someone who doesn't know the difference between the words perspective and prospective, or the definition of pusillanimity.
I'd also have some very definite concerns about such an individual critiquing any enterprise, let alone a school, and the concern we should have for any child about whom they are making education choices should be manifest.
Again, if you are unhappy here it is due to your own (and your husband's?) lack of due diligence before buying your home.
Not Gary Englert
9:47 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@Gary: The previous principal had a sign above her door that said something about 'nobody gets to see the wizard.' It might have been funny had it not been true.
barry_geltzeiler
4:33 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
what makes me "skepical" is that WOSKEPTIC does not have any kids in the our school sytem but claims to be knowledgable and thinks we need education reform. My kids perform at top levels BECAUSE of their WO education. My senior is getting into good schools and both of my kids are better off because they went to school in the real world. Please do not make empty statements when your kids are not products of OUR system as Cynthia, Michelle, Lisa, Gary and myself children are.
Maybe you should take the time out and speak to many of our HS students and see for yourself. Oh and by the way I am a WOHS '79 grad and choose to live here over the neighboring communities.
Michelle Cadeau
4:41 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Spot on!
john anthony prignano
4:45 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
woskeptic We too have some terrific neighbors . I am sure you are truthful and correct about everything you write , and I mean everything . I speak from personal experience. Like you , I will not sacrifice the truth to "Property Values " or the "If you can't beat them ,join them " mentality . A large number of my generation are syncophants and obsequious , groveling compulsive {or worse } liars .woskeptic ,keep fighting the good fight .Bravo !
Gary Englert
5:02 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh... and the twice failed candidate for Mayor weighs in...still wondering why someone as habitually negative as he could not even come close to being elected!
Mark Paulson
4:49 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Gary, if it cost's at least a $1000 for the cheapest one bedroom apartment in West Orange, ( I was unaware that that is where they start), then the proposed units at the Edison development are going to be a great deal. Anyway, the cost doesn't matter. What does matter is that there are a lot of people in West Orange who struggle to make ends meet. That is hard on families and has a direct impact on the school system no matter how good the teachers are. It costs a ton of money to live here and some people really find it difficult. I am very grateful that I have not had to experience the financial difficulties that so many people deal with every day,
john anthony prignano
5:44 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
TEST SCORES : Edison Middle School grade 6 : 23.2% falied Language/Reading 25% failed Math . Liberty Middle School, Grade 7 : 23.8% failed Language /Reading ,28.2% failed Math . Hazel Avenue Elementary School : Grade 3 : 40% failed Language/Reading 20% failed Math Grade 4: 31% failed Language/Reading 22% failed Math Grade 5 ; 51% failed Laguage/Reading 13% failed Math Response : Longer school day and year ? Eliminate or reform tenure ? Professional standards ? REAL anti -cronyism nepotism policies ? Nah . We're an "Abbott Rim District " { ? } Low income single parent households , non English speaking students , bad economy , test scores don't matter , and of course MY kids are getting a great education { So to Hell with the rest ? } Police Director Parisi said crime was up 36% from the same period last year . Restore or increase staffing levels ? Better deployment ? Nah . Just say "It's a reflection of a bad economy .Things are tough all over Besides , this kinda stuff has always gone on " Pave the crumbled streets ? Trim the badly overgrown trees and remove the hanging limbs ? Keep the streets clean ? Nah . Lets give a developer millions to develop the Battery Building and ignore reality Property values people , property values. It's ALOT easier to say things are good and to make excuses than to work at improving things and face reality .
Michelle Cadeau
5:55 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Who is giving a developer millions to develop? And is Parisi Police Director?
Gary Englert
6:07 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ Michelle Cadeau: Mr. Prignano is taking this stream off topic and we really shouldn't humor him.
Yes, Mayor Parisi is the titular Police Director, a civilian slot that sets policy and budget for the Dpeartment but is not involved in day to day operations. With guidance (as necessary) from teh Business Administrator, the WOPD is in good hands.
The proposal for Edison Village (to be discussed on 2/21) calls for the Township to issue $6.3 Million in bonds to finance rebuilding and improvements of the roads, seewers and infrastructure that it already owns, in and around the Edison site. Revenues from the PILOT program will offset the cost of the bonds. The taxpayer having any liability would be an exteme, doomsday scenario.
Michelle Cadeau
7:11 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
OK, I had no clue that was one of his titles too. I prefer to call him Mr. Mayor.
So there are no bonds or millions for the development per see but an investment in the town, which is so needed. Why should the people living on Main Street and behind the Edison Bldgn have to live like that. For anyone who feels we shouldn't do anything about that area I invite you to go live there for a week or two. Or just take a drive thru the neighborhood.
We could have a great down town with revenue from some great stores and restaurants in that area. Reviving downtown would also add value to the rest of the town.
john anthony prignano
10:09 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
My neighborhood has been deteriorating badly for several years. Why must people livie in abyssmal conditions on Main Street and behind the Edison building because taxpayer- owned infrastructure has been allowed to fall apart ?. , How long has thiis situation existed , { The Battery Redevelopment Project has been actively pursued for many years } and why is it only now the town is commited to correct the squalid conditions ?The town has bonded for mllions over the years for school athletic fields and athetic facilities and tracks . It appears to be gross mismanagement and terribly misplaced priorities .
Michelle Cadeau
7:17 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Montclair
7th grade Hebron Middle School 25% failed Language /Reading. 35% failed math.
4th grade Rand Elem 48 % failed Language /Reading 30% failed math.
Michelle Cadeau
7:22 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Hazel free or reduced lunch 51%
Rand 24%
So we are doing better than Montclair with many more disadvantaged kids.
MP
7:29 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
If the 25% single parents cannot afford the $1000 rent, they are free to go to a place that is cheaper for them. Other hard working tax payers have no obligation to support them. They should work hard, try to stay married and raise their kids in a good household. If they cannot do that, they shouldn't get married and have children, period.
Not Gary Englert
9:48 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Dude, really?
woskeptic
7:38 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Thank you Mr. Prignano! Mr. Englert and Ms. Cadeau think that because my children aren't in the public schools that I haven't a clue about them. I have been relating stories from others who DO have kids in the schools. What if I was a reporter doing interviews around town and wrote and article quoting people? Yet somehow, my writing about these issues is "defamatory". I have said all along that not ALL the schools are bad. But test scores and other issues do reflect a general problem.
Then Mr. Englert prefers to disparage my intelligence because I happen to not be a human dictionary memorizing all the words in the English language. By the way Mr. Englert, you have many typos in your messages. Should I consider that a lack of skill or intelligence? Get off it, already! I was with my children when I went to look at the school. I spoke very politely to the principal and she greeted me with, "What are you here for, again? I don't really have time to talk to you." Then I said I had made an appointment with her and she gave me a dirty look and said, "My secretary will handle your questions." I barely got to have a conversation with her and she foisted me off even though I spent EIGHT months trying to get a meeting with her. I only got one after writing to the Superintendent (since retired).
Michelle Cadeau
7:44 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
And Principal since retired!!
Michelle Cadeau
8:17 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
I understand what you are saying and coming from. However, with kids that have been in the district for 6 years and being very involved in town and my kids school and all my friends (except one family) have their kids in the public schools here in WO, I feel I have more knowledge of the schools. I do see problems in our school but you know what, I try to be apart of the solution. I brought the WOAHO tutoring program to our school, I have helped start literacy programs etc. And believe me it is not about MY kids. they are fine. As a resident and more so house owner having invested in WO I feel it is my job to help out as much as I can.
I too would have been worried if what you say about the former Principal is true. However, I bet you that if you picked up the phone today and asked Mr Acevedo the same questions he would not only invite you TODAY he would give you the full tour, sit down and answer your questions and you would not want to have your daughter go anywhere else.
You have to relaize why the test scores are bad. Some of our students don't speak any English, many are special ed (because we are know for the great programs) , others have parents that work 2 jobs and don't have time to help them. But as a community we are pretty darn good at helping each other. We have great volunteers who do a lot!!
Is everything perfect? No, but as Barry said (here or on a diff thread) we live in the real world.
Michelle Cadeau
8:19 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
It cout me off so this is the end of my posting :-)
I am sorry you feel the way you do and sorry that you are not 100% proud of where you live. I know thought that I am 100% poud of being a WO resident, happy to be able to raise my kids here and eager to help where I can to make try to make what is 'not perfect' to as 'good as we can make it.'
Not Gary Englert
9:35 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Ms Cadeau is correct about Mr. Acevedo. Hazel is still undoing the miserable culture the previous principal created.
Gary Englert
11:23 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@ woskeptic:
You wrote:
"I have been relating stories from others who DO have kids in the schools. What if I was a reporter doing interviews around town and wrote and article quoting people?"
Anymously relating the stories of anonymous others is as a profound an example of hearsay as likely exists. For your edification, hearsay is defined as:
(1.) unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one's direct knowledge: I pay no attention to hearsay.
(2.) an item of idle or unverified information or gossip; rumor: a malicious hearsay.
As such, it would be foolish to rely or act on any such information.
A reporter doing interviews and quoting people would include their names in any resulting article, which would also include the author's byline.
Can you possibly see the problem with your posts now?
woskeptic
7:45 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
As for the foolishness of me and my husband in moving here...well, we bought at a time when there were bidding wars on every house we saw. We did do our diligence and we were told that some people zoned for Hazel do in fact send their kids to Gregory. At the time our children were babies so school seemed a long way off and honestly, we thought we'd live here for a few years and move on before the kids started school. Too bad I didn't have a crystal ball to find out our mortgage is worth more than our house now and there isn't a prayer of selling it in the near future. So yep, we should have done our due diligence with a fortune teller so we wouldn't have gotten into this mess. You, Mr. Englert are as charming and polite as the lovely principal I dealt with. How you got so far in this town (by bullying perhaps?) I'll never know. Do you not see any bad in WO? How can I take you seriously when you won't acknowledge that there is room for improvement? The kids whose test scores are failing should point you in that direction. Kudos to the parents whose kids are excelling. But that says more about your parenting than about the quality of the schools. Feel free to disparage me. But I am writing from my observations, from things I've heard from parents of children in the WO schools, and because as long as I do live here, I still care and wish WO could improve. The downtown area would be another great starting point. But that's a whole other conversation.
woskeptic
8:09 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Mr. Geltzeiler, I haven't said I'm knowledgeable on this subject. I related my experience when I attempted to find out information regarding Hazel. I was met by a rude, and stonewalling principal who had no interest in telling me about the school. I have made observations about behavior I have seen from the kids. Not ALL the kids behave a certain way, but I have seen incidences and have heard things from the children of my neighbors. I am merely discussing my impressions, and perspective. You can tell me that Hazel and every public school in WO is the most outstanding in the state. I doubt you would believe that yourself. Congratulations to you on the success of your children. How fortunate that you sent them to a place where they thrived.
Despite your assertion, I am living in the REAL world. In the real world people have differing views. In the real world you have to learn that not everyone will share your opinion. My kids are not in fantasy land. They are in the world. Just because they go to private school doesn't mean they don't know how to socialize, interact, or otherwise navigate the world. Since your kids don't attend private school you have no knowledge about them and can't with any authority question whether they're in the REAL world or not. That's how you sound when I make a comment about public schools. You have your impressions about private school, don't you? Doesn't make your opinion invalid. At least I respect your right to say it.
Michelle Cadeau
8:26 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
I think with 'real world' Barry means the diversity of students (ethnicity, religion, ability, socio-economics) This you can NOT get at private school. Our kids attending WO PSs get an education that is such a learning experience and that can't be bought for money.
Our WO PS students don't just know how to navigate the world. They are the WORLD! Literally!
barry_geltzeiler
10:13 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
woskeptic i invite you into my home and meet my children and myself ,products of the WO school system. Is the system perfect, no far from it. But there is a quality education to be had. Our school system has all the good and bad the world has to offer. It is up to us as parents to guide our children. Remeber the schools only have them 7 hours a day, we have them the rest. BTW I never said your children are not in the real world, nor did I mean to disparage you and them in any way. What my message is; your perception of the WOHS schools is somewhat off base. I have no personal experience with private school, but my wife attended them in NYC. I never voiced an opinion on private schools or passed judegement, I just spoke of the WO schools. Please contact me ar barrygeltz@gmail.com if you would like to meet some of our students who took advantage of all the great things our schools have to offer. I am sure it will give you a different perspective.
Cynthia Cumming
8:11 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Mp... You are the wow post today. :p
Michelle Cadeau
8:24 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
MP was joking right?
woskeptic
8:42 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ Michelle Cadeau - my kids are in school with children of all races: white, black, hispanic, Indian, Asian, etc. They come from poorer towns (Irvington, Orange, West Orange, South Orange, Livingston, Newark, West Caldwell, etc.) They come from affluent families and families who need assistance with tuition. They are also from varying religious backgrounds, etc. Again, not fair to say they're not in the REAL world. It's just a different educational model. One that I thought was a better learning environment for my kids. You have to know your own kids...I felt mine would do better under the private school model.
Michelle Cadeau
9:01 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Congrats! Wgat school do they go to? Is it a 50/50 of white and minorties in the school? What's the raito?
john anthony prignano
8:28 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
The " Mission Statement " of the public schools - " Preparing children to compete in a hyper -competitive hi-tech global economy " is a crock . Compare West Orange to Millburn and Livingston and here it comes : Not fair ! Higher incomes , more parental involvement , better educated parents , homogeneous , more motivated students !! These are neighboring towns The educrats will not accept comparisons to neighboring towns, let alone other countries . How do we stack up next to Japan? Not fair ! More affluent , homogeneous , more involved and better educated parents etc. According to the educrats , largely external and uncontrollable factors guarantee academic failure . No amount of money or great educators can do much of anything to change one's destiny . People who flee from competition cannot teach competitivness . The pseudo - scientists have concocted what else ? A pseudo - scientific failure formula: Parents not well educated and not involved or not involved enough { How do they quantify that ? } unmotivated or undermotivated students [ { Again , how do they quantify that ? } family income ,broken homes and so on and so on . These children will ABSOLUTELY fail . That's where self -esteem education and lack of accountability come in . The children must be made to understand that there was failure { Not their's } because of almost exclusively external factors beyond anyone's control . Rotten public schools , where making excuses is our business ,our only business .
john anthony prignano
8:33 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
woskeptic You're welcome And thank you very much. As Victor Lazslo said to Rick at the end of Casablanca " Thank you , and welcome back to the fight ".
woskeptic
8:35 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@Michelle Cadeau - I can appreciate all that you just posted. At least you have a respectful and empathetic view of my opinions. (Mr. Englert referring to someone as "twice failed candidate for mayor weighing in" How does that advance the topic of conversation? He is just saying nasty things just to say them. It serves no purpose.) It also amazes me how you are able to get things done when having to deal with people who are on a high horse and won't open their ears or hearts to another opinion. I said over and over that I didn't think all of WO public schools were bad. He never gave my opinions the slightest consideration. He just was intent on batting them down.
Yes, it is sad that I don't feel more proud of this town. We moved here with hopes and dreams and unfortunately we have met with some disappointment. Again, I do think we have kind, lovely, neighbors, and that's worth a LOT! My kids do participate in MTL sports and have enjoyed that. But I still say, that just because they aren't getting a public education doesn't mean they are in a bubble of some sort. True, there is a different approach to education, but at the college level all backgrounds will mix: public, private, parochial, home-schooled, etc. These people of different backgrounds and educational styles will bring their own unique perspectives to how things are done in the future. That's what makes the world go round.
Michelle Cadeau
8:58 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
well, I belive that college is too late. Those are adults (or young adults) Our kis (WOPS kids) have lived, gone to school with and socialized ith people from out of their 'cultural zone' their entire life. They will have a huge advantage over young adults no trying to 'learn other cultures' Totally different. There are people making lots of money on teaching people cultural awareness , acceptance, understanding etc but our kids are gettig it for free.
Gary Englert
11:04 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@ woskeptic: Not having just fallen off a turnip truck in West Orange, I do know the value of having some historical perspective and knowledge of the public stands and accomplishments (or complete lack thereof) of people pontificating around these parts.
The fact that Mr. Prignano has twice run very unsuccessfully (receiving only 164 of 13,000 votes cast his first outing and losing 80% to 20% on his second) for Mayor and has been complaining loud and long about everyone and everything (without being involved in one, single, positive initiative, program or organization in town) should be germane to anyone evaluating his opinion.
But, that's juts me.
Adam Kraemer
8:53 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
West Orange is a GH Group School district. The state groups schools A thru J. Group A has has districts like Newark and Camden while districts like Millburn and Princeton fall in J group. Of the forty some odd GH group school districts West Orange has standardized test scores trending low with in this group and per student spending trending high with in this group. If this is not reason to look for reform of how we run the West Orange public schools, I do not know what data would cause people to want reform.
Gary Englert
12:14 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@ Adam Kraemer: Missing from your overview of of district factor groups is that the designations are indicative of a community's socio-economic status and are based on its median household income.
What you have failed to acknowledge is that, that with 30% of its children qualifying for federally subsidized lunch programs, the population of our public schools does not reflect the socio-economic status of the community at large.
This is just one of a host of anomalies that make attempts to compare one school district to another a fool's errand, as no two are truly alike.
john anthony prignano
8:54 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Years ago , then Schools Superintendent Dr. Suprina sent home a letter with a quote from a renowned educational expert " The most important classroom resource is time " Dozens more school mandates then when I was a student , and the school board and teachers have responded by reducing school hours . When there are challenges , we all must try harder , and do MORE .
rak
10:01 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
"Woskeptic kids will do just great. They live in a economically/racially diverse town and she has said that their private school is racially diverse. Her children are of mixed race. Michelle - how much more diversity do they need. She just doesn't like the public school in her neighborhood. You can't get rid misbehaved kids in a public school. Private schools will only tolerate it so long and then you are out. Why should her kids waste any time waiting for a teacher to repeatedly discipline a kid/kids when they could be engaged and learning. A school isn't turned around just because a principal leaves--it takes time. Woskeptic shouldn't waste any of her children's time if she feels it's not the right environment.
It's too bad that Gary and Michelle can't stand to hear an opinion that differs from their own.
Rose King
woskeptic
11:49 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Thank you Rose! I was going to point that out to Ms. Cadeau! My kids were born in NYC and my husband's family is still there. Just being in proximity to it is world diversity! The fact that my kids are mixed is already a life lesson in different cultures. They have friends of all races and in fact, rather than looking so much at the diversity, my kids just see others as...kids. Not a particular color, language, or background. They wouldn't understand a homogenous classroom! They just see that the world is made up of all kinds of people. I've told them, "God likes to paint with all the colors." How boring the world would be otherwise.
Also, you hit the nail on the head regarding how their school is. Bullying, or other disruptive behavior isn't tolerated. They will try to sort things out if there are issues, but if a child is affecting all the other classmates, then the parents have to correct that child's behavior or they're not allowed to continue. It's called CONSEQUENCES. Another very REAL WORLD concept.
So...thank you for backing me up in the discussion!
@Michelle Cadeau: I appreciate your concern, but I do get confused as how you'd think my kids were isolated from the WORLD as you put it. It doesn't make sense when their own family is diverse, as well as their school.
Cynthia Cumming
10:24 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
I think Woskeptic and Mr. Prignano have equally strong opinions that they have spent quite a bit of time and space advocating for. If they want their views respected and read, then they have to accept that others may disagree and those folks are also allowed to voice their opinions. I would however, like to mention a few things. The former Hazel principal ran a school that was given Blue Ribbon status, so the comments about 'undoing the culture' are unfair and inaccurate. The current principal is addressing many of the demographic issues that have made educating as diverse a population as West Orange challenging. As for district classification, West Orange is unique in that it is classified as a 'wealthier' district, though 33% of its students are considered economically disadvantaged. And Millburn, Livingston, Caldwell, etc., all failed AYP this year too. Let's see what happens now that NJ is no longer required to follow NCLB statutes.
Gladys
7:27 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
NGE's comments about the culture at Hazel under the previous administration are completely accurate, don't let that old Blue Ribbon fool you. My kids got a fabulous education at Hazel thanks to the teachers. Unfortunately, the former principal was beyond difficult to deal with and my children suffered as a result. Unless your kids went there you really wouldn't know about the culture of the school, so you'll just have to take the word of those who've been there. I understand Mr. Acevedo is a pleasure and people in our neighborhood are happy to send their kids to Hazel.
Mark Paulson
10:59 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
I am a supporter of the West Orange school district but it is interesting to note that this is the Millburn-Short Hills Patch. They don't seem to have any school issues to discuss. Maybe all of the complainers should move there.
Gary Englert
11:28 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
I have no problem, whatsoever, in hearing divergent opinions and, specifically, ones that disagree with my own. Intelligently presented without rancor, I am more than capable of simply agreeing to disagree.
I don't know what anyone was taught at Northeastern (or elsewhere) but, any high school or college paper I ever wrote was replete with the requisite footnotes and a bibliography in which my sources were noted and credited. Coupled with my having embraced a founding legal principle of this country, that one has a right to face their accuser, I have a healthy skepticism of, and disdain for, anonymous assertions. Purely and simply, they make separating the wheat from the chaff annoying and often impossible.
Another issue in this stream (as evidenced by woskeptic and, most recently, rak) are some reading comprehension problems. Nowhere in my posts did I state that there was no room for improvement in our public schools; what I repeatedly pointed out was that it is difficult to accept, let alone act upon, anonymous reports on much of anything and that they serve no useful purpose.
It's an old saw but, all too true: pointing out problem is easy, finding solutions for them is far more difficult. Failed political candidates who incessantly complain yet, having no record, whatsoever, of any positive civic accomplishemnt should be identified for who and what they are and disregarded.
None of this is evidence of either beligerence or combativeness: it is common sense.
woskeptic
12:01 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
sigh. Gary, Gary, Gary. You don't get it. This isn't a courtroom and I'm not publishing a paper or a book. I wish to remain private. If I gave you a first and last name, what does that have to do with my perceptions or opinions? I'm just a parent explaining why I felt uncomfortable sending my kids to Hazel. I've given numerous examples as to why. I actually have heard that Mr. Acevedo is a great principal and is doing great things at the school. For me, it doesn't change my decision because my kids are happy and well adjusted in their school. They enjoy their friends, their classes, and their activities. So I'm not going to switch things up.
Again, I am bewildered as to why putting a first and last name would carry any further weight. It wouldn't change what I'm saying. I've given you specifics and examples - like my unfortunate meeting with the former principal. I spoke with parents who had dealt with her and had arguments and issues with her. It's not some six degrees of separation hearsay. It's speaking to parents who were upset and relating various incidences they had with her. The good news is she's gone and Mr. Acevedo seems to be reaching out to the parents and is making himself available to address parental concerns. That's wonderful.
Anyway, if I say: hello my name is really Mary Sommers would that make you say, "NOW I can take this person seriously!" It's silly!
Gary Englert
12:40 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
woskeptic: It is you who does not "get it" and who had to be cajoled to provide even basic information as to who and what your criticisms where directed toward to even begin to make any sense of them.
Why put a name and face to your opinion?
Well, believe it or not, people do post absolute nonsense on the Internet!
You could claim to be Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy or Jesus Christ just as easily as claiming to be a parent of school age children with some valid experience or observation in your pocket.
It isn't silly at all for me to know this and to be guided accordingly.
Not that I always agree with each of them (I don't) but, when a Barry Geltzeiler, Cynthia Cumming, Michelle Cadeau or Mark Paulson post something, I have more than a passing idea who they are, what their community involvements are and why they are in a position to opine as they have. I also know that they're people who just don't talk, they do.
I also know that they are real, well intentioned human beings and not some kid stirring the pot from behind a computer keyboard in their Mom and Dad's basement.
Conversely, I know that when a John Prignano or an Adam Kraemer posts that there is a political agenda afoot...that they talk a good game and have actually done nothing...and that their ramblings are best taken with a grain...no, make that a bag...of salt.
It ain't rocket science.
woskeptic
11:36 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@Mark Paulson: the reason this got started on the Millburn/Short Hills Patch is because of the article posted there discussing public vs. private schools and the how the numbers skewed. I'm sure many of us would move if we could afford it. Lest you think I'm a snob - I was looking for diversity and I have found it - in the private school my kids attend. They are happy and thriving. So, really, I don't have any complaints. Nor should you: I pay my taxes that benefit the WO public schools, so I'm obviously doing my part to finance these paragons of education.
It's interesting that people concerned about education, and who inhabit a particular town are "complainers" just because they are asking questions, or debating issues within that town. As a tax paying resident it's my right to know where my dollars go. Especially if I feel I'm not able to utilize a particular service like the public schools because of those concerns. According to you, all those with issues should shut up, put smiles on, and pretend everything is dandy. I thought America is about freedom of speech and expression. I guess not if you're "complaining".
john anthony prignano
12:00 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
My sport of choice was powerlifting . I won many contests , and I lost quite a few . I was in the 181 3/4 weight class. I won contests because I picked up more weight than my competitors . I lost when someone picked up more weight than I did .Period . No socio-economic factors, there was no E for effort , and no one showed any regard for an also - ran's self esteem Educating children is too important to use " Guilty with an explanation " arguments ,or " When I explain to you why there's such a high failure rate , you'll come to realize that given the myriad adverse conditions i've articulated , we're actually very successful. "Just as sure as fire burns and water's wet . children CAN'T learn when the school is closed . The best teacher in the world is utterly useless if they're not teaching . The merits of all these mandates is an argument for another day .The point is , more and more stuff has to get done in fewer and fewer hours . If people are happy with the schools, that's fine with me .If the P.T.A. and the Advocates and others don't think we need more classroom hours, that's fine If you think test scores don't mean very much , who am I to argue ? But, I am not going to let people rationalize failure on something so important . As much as possiibe , I judge. teachers and students on objective criteria . More time and more effort may not be the panacea , but that's how, more often than not , I was able to pick up more weight than the other guy .
woskeptic
12:06 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@ Gary Englert: Pray, tell us your solutions! We would love to hear them! Since you are obviously a leader in the community, lead us to the betterment of our schools and our town!
We're waiting....
P.S. You are the one who posted with rancor because I wasn't aware of the definition of a word you used and you called another a "failed candidate". That has nothing to do with this discussion. You're also proving my point, aren't you....I received a public school education...guess it didn't serve me too well...
woskeptic
12:09 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Doesn't Governor Christie send his kids to private school? Hmmm....NJ Governor...no public school....what could that mean?
Cynthia Cumming
12:31 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
FYI Gov. Christie's mom was a BOE president in Livingston and he went to public school. His issue is with the teachers unions.
john anthony prignano
1:23 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Governor Chris Christie is an outspoken and harsh critic of New Jersey's public schools One of the greatest supporters of public education , Governor Richard Codey , while he resided in West Orange , sent his kids to Montclair Kimberly . Academy . ??
Michelle Cadeau
8:47 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
I am not sure if Christie is a role model for many here. Certainly not for me and my family ;-)
woskeptic
12:25 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@Michelle Cadeau: I would like to add one more thing to your comment that by college it's too late to know other cultures. It doesn't make sense: first of all, I'll use myself as an example. I grew up in an affluent, fairly homogenous community. My school had pretty much no diversity. Yet here I am married to a man of another race. Wouldn't that run counter to what you're saying? Also, does that mean there is no hope for people in the midwest? Not a lot of diversity in some of those places...
Michelle Cadeau
8:39 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
I didn't say it is too late but it is too late for you acceptance to be something normal in your life. At college age you have to 'learn' how to interact, how to socialize, cutlural ques etc ith/from omther qultures. Our WOPS kids have that in their blood.
I am sure that if you find a study about the midwest and their level of acceptance of others you will find some interesting data. Or you can just take a look at Texas right of the bat.
Far from everyone is willing to change when a young adult. Good for you that you embrased diversity.
I asked before but I guess t was lost. What school do your kids go to? it would be interesting to see which private school around here could 'compete' with the diversity in the WO public schools.
Michelle Cadeau
8:43 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Like a multilingual child say Spanish - English. He/she accuires a langauge. Does learn it.
A person the age of a college student has to LEARN and study Spanish and he/she will probbaly never learn it to the point of their mutlilingual friend. Some might never learn some might be able to pick up some fluency.
Same thing with acceptance and cultural learning.
Cynthia Cumming
12:30 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
My kids start classes at the high school at 7:30 and classes run to 2:17 with a 20 minute lunch. What schedules do private schools have?
woskeptic
12:53 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Cynthia: re: Gov. Christie - fair enough. I was just sayin'...
My kids aren't at the high school level. They are in elementary. Classes start @ 8:00 and pick up is at 2:45. K-3 gets snack time. : )
woskeptic
12:56 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Lunch, too of course. : )
Portmanteau
6:06 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Education is a highly volatile and personal issue. "It" is not a one size fits all system but rather a compromise. What I find most fascinating about the whole affair is that somehow in some way many children manage to make the most of the public schools and in the end overcome disabilities and challenges and enjoy personal victories every single school year. It is inspiring. What I find highly offensive is the toxic approach taken by some parents in the name of advocating for their kids. In fact many of these fail to see the good things around them and the advances that are made for the hundreds of kids. Yes, we all want to live the American Dream, but somehow it has become a nightmare. Look in the mirror people.
Adam Kraemer
6:57 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@ Gary: You don't like the state designated groups for comparison and educational measurement and testing. However citizens and parents need some metrics as to how the public schools are doing. I think the measuring is system in place is reasonable and fair. That being said: What metrics would you use? Should we have no metrics and just spend tens of millions or hundreds of millions in taxpayer money for the West Orange Public Schools with no system of measurement or educational outcomes and no system to help hold educators accountable? Is that your plan?
Gary Englert
9:33 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@ Adam Kramer: As the father of triplets, you're in a unique position to answer questions about comparisons concerning children (micro) that might then be applied to schools and school systems (macro) and, more specifically, the ultimate nonsense that District Factor Group (DFG) pairings are.
As similar as your children may be, are they indeed different?
Can you tell one from the other?
Do they have different likes, dislikes, aptitudes and inabilities or is one indistinguishable from another?
While a rhetorical questions (though I'd certainly be curious to hear your answers) the same types of questions need to be asked about any school in a particular DFG.
Whatever similarities there might be, there are significant differences that aren't factor into labels such as "identical triplets" or "District Factor Group GH."
DFGs are (allegedly) an indicator of scio-economic status (SES) were assigned to each community using the following criteria:
1) Percent of adults with no high school diploma
2) Percent of adults with some college education
3) Occupational status
4) Unemployment rate
5) Percent of individuals in poverty
6) Median family income.
West Orange (and all other schools) were assigned their DFG classification in 1990 and it has remained unchanged since. While you haven't been around that long, I can assure you that the demographic in West Orange has changed dramatically since, if not our relative median income.
(To be continued...)
Gary Englert
10:50 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
What do Alexandria Township (Hunterdon, Population 4,934, 97% white), Stanhope (Sussex, Population 3,510, 91.4% white) and Stone Harbor (Cape May, Population 866, 98.7% white) and West Orange (Essex, Population 46,207, 57.1% white) have in common?
Not a damned thing, other than having comparable median household income and, thusly, being assigned to the same District Factor Group (GH) and having our schools and test scoes compared with theirs!
Purely and simply this is a fool's errand and the metric created (that you think is fair?) provides nothing more than bragging rights for whoever tops the chart.
We as human beings are an evolving species and the mix of individual intellectual and physical aptitudes are as widespread and varied as there are people on the planet. As similar as any two might be, they ARE different. Unlike Mr. Spock, we have yet to morph into Vulcans imbued with pure logic and intellect and sans emotion.
Our goal should be to provide the best education that a particular child is capable, willing and able to absorb and help them flourish to the best of their abilities, knowing full well that not every one of them will become an Enrico Fermi or Albert Einstein.
woskeptic
9:26 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@Michelle Cadeau: I'm curious, do you believe that just because there's a lot of diversity in an area that everyone is accepting of each other? The little girl on my street was crying because a group of girls kept calling her "white girl". My husband grew up in NYC - as diverse as it comes - and he's heard his share of slurs growing up. Yes, growing up among a more diverse population is more likely to lead to a broader world view, but by all means, not everyone is going to embrace it. I think it's a bit shocking that you paint growing up here as being SO superior compared to some other town or area. Diversity in and of itself does not make for understanding.
Michelle Cadeau
9:41 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
No not because there is diversity in an area but because they go to school together. NYC is 'diverse' but very segregated in many places so that is not 'as diverse as it comes' Living next door to someone with a different faith, lifestyle, ethnicity doesn't mean you live a diverse life. But spending 7 hours a day with diverse people and learning everyday things from their 'culture' does.
And if you look at the 'new' families in WO (meaning not the ones that have been here for generations) we moved here for that so for us (which is a big group at this point) diversity was a big part in why we came here. So we will be willing to embrace the diversity all way through (not only having the kids see that in school).
I do think that the cultural (meaning faith, lifestyle, disabilities, ethnicity) education our kids get here is something that will help them in every way of life. And yes I do think growing up with that is superior. A few other towns around here has that but not all and another few not at all.
Of course it is not a miracle environment and of course external things (like the parents view) will still shine through but I do think that most of the kids growing up in the public schools here are WAY a head of a kid growing up in a homogenious environment.
The diverse enviornment here is the number 1 factor of why we oicked WO to raise or kids.
Mark Paulson
9:59 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
This discussion is an example of amazing diversity. It is a freedom that we enjoy in this country that others can only dream about. The opportunities that we enjoy every day can easily go unnoticed. Even though I don't agree with everything that is being said, at least I am exposed to people with different opinions. West Orange is a melting pot of so many different ideas. Whether we like them or not, we should be grateful that we can enjoy this diversity together.
Michelle Cadeau
10:31 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Very true!
woskeptic
10:21 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
I agree that having diversity is important. But I don't think that just because someone may not be exposed to that makes them incapable of embracing that. We did in fact pick WO because of the diversity. I just disagree that school is the only way kids can truly absorb a diverse town. I doubt the 7 hours of school is spent learning about each others' cultures. They are there learning math, science, reading, writing, language, etc. They aren't holding hands singing Kumbaya. That being said, my kids do interact with all different races and backgrounds, but I'm pretty certain they aren't sitting around talking about their various heritages. They work in the classroom together (fostering cooperation) they play together (fostering friendship). That's what learning about the world is about. They also learn that the world can be difficult and unjust, when they study the Civil Rights Movement, or the Holocaust. The real world is not one big happy place. Nor is this town. It has its positives and its negatives.
Michelle Cadeau
10:30 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
I see it pretty clear that your kids and my kids learning experiences are totally different. At my kids school they don't get taught diversity, they LIVE it. It is hard to explain more than that - but you know it when you see it.
The things you mention (fostering friendship etc) you get in any school. What you get in most of the WO public schools is beyond that.
I have not said 7 hours is spent learning about each others cultures but within the 7 hours a day cultural and social ques come up all the time.
I said this is not a miracle environment and you will have kids that are less and more accepting to this. Like you have yourself being an example of the opposite. I am sure your kids and other kids in home environments teaching them acceptance etc will be great citizens and embrace diversity. I just think that even without that support at home for example if you are in our schools you just get that regardless.
And again people are paying loads of money to teach and get that understanding our kids get for 'free'
This is MY opinion and I am not at all asking you to see it the same way.
.
woskeptic
12:38 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Michelle: I just get frustrated because you think my kids are TAUGHT about diversity. My kids LIVE it too. (Since you put it in caps.) I am frustrated that you think only WO schools provide diversity. That somehow because I make a tuition payment (although so are you with your taxes) that my kids are isolated, not in a diverse environment, and somehow are having an inferior experience.
woskeptic
12:46 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
I never disparaged the quality of the education that Hazel provides. Although I'm sure based on the public record, test scores could be improved upon. But all schools have room for improvement.
My comments stemmed from my own experience dealing with the principal (prior to Mr. Acevedo) and how I was treated rudely, wasn't able to ask questions about the school, and saw some questionable behavior that concerned me.
What I find appealing about private school is that there is more discipline and structure in their day. That may not appeal to everyone. But it's the right environment for my kids. I like that there are expectations put on them about how they conduct themselves in school and that even when they are out of school they are to remember that they are representatives of their school. I like that there is freedom to incorporate things into the curriculum such as mandatory service to the poor, elderly, and hungry in the surrounding communities. I like that there are consequences for bad behavior and distractions in class are not tolerated. They are there to learn, to conduct themselves with dignity and respect for others. Perhaps that's too strict for some. I happen to feel those things will serve them well in the future. Not expecting you to see it my way, but those were my reasons for not choosing Hazel. I never once said a child couldn't receive a good education there. I just said I saw some problems and it made me uneasy with choosing that school.
Michelle Cadeau
12:49 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
And you assume that those rules are not the same at any WO public school? Well, then after meeting with Barry and his daughters I am sure you can ask for a tour at any of the WO schools and you will see that those rules are exactly the same.
Michelle Cadeau
12:46 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
I don't talk specifically about YOUR kids or even MINE. I talk about any child. Further more, you have told me your kids are in a very, on all level diverse school, you are in an interracial marriage, so why would I be talking about YOUR kids? (still no answer on which this truly diverse private school is but that is OK)
I am talking about the average kids, one is going thru the WO Public schools and one is in an all white (or all black) private school. And even if the all white kid lives in WO he/she is not as exposed (by any means) as the kid in the WO PS even if they live in the same town. Then take in to consideration that there is probably a reason why a white kid goes to an all white Private School if they live in WO.
MP
12:47 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
The only practical solution to improve education in WO is to open charter schools. The good students can go there and others can stay in the public schools and learn at their own pace without losing their self-esteem. The long time residents should realize that the performance of public schools in WO changed in the last 15 years. This solution will keep our house prices from reaching Newark level. It is on a free fall now.
woskeptic
12:51 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Just to wrap up...I wonder if you've considered that many people have not been exposed to the level of diversity in WO. Perhaps it's the WO kids who are in a bubble...what will they do when they meet people who are going to have vastly different upbringings? Are they going to be in for a shock that not everyone views the world in such an embracing way?
I think mass media (TV, Internet, Movies, etc.) make it pretty hard for anyone nowadays not to get a sense of the various cultures and differences in the world. I think even those kids in Nebraska who don't have massive diversity will still figure out how to work with, make friends, with, and interact with the rest of the world. : )
Michelle Cadeau
12:59 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
We are on two totally different levels. Not saying you are wrong or that my thoughts are more valid than yours. we just have a totally different view. I am talking 'soul.'
My kids speak three languages ... when the go to a fourth country where they speak a language they don't understand will their ability to speak 3 languages hinder or help them?
Michelle Cadeau
12:57 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
To compare a TV show to the life of a kid with classmates from say 12 different countries, speaking 5 different languages in class, having say 6 different religious views and the fundamental education that gives is like comparing apples and oranges (no pun intended)
Laura Griffin
12:58 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Thank you, everyone, for your comments. This thread is now closed.