.

Millburn School Board Candidates Debate the Issues

The four candidates running for the three Board of Education seats participate in the first public forum.

The Short Hills Association hosted the first of two public forums for the Millburn Board of Education candidates on Thursday evening.

Arp Trivedi, a member of the association, moderated the forum and led the discussion with 30 minutes of questions from the association. Following Trivedi, the public had the opportunity to question the candidates.

The four candidates vying for the three board seats are Elliot Cahn, Dr. Eric Siegel, an incumbent, Dr. Rupali Wadhwa and Raymond Wong. 

Here’s some of candidates’ responses from the Short Hills Association’ prepared questions:

What changes would you proposed to improve the relationship between the board and the public?

Siegel: All we can do as a board is be honest with the public. We can get information back to the public faster. We can probably improve out website because I think it's a little bit out dated. We just need to improve by listening to the public with on-going strategic planning meetings. 

Cahn: I will make the board listen. I don't believe they do. I would welcome the public and encourage their participation in a number of different ways. First and foremost bring back the public 100-year old right to vote on the school budget. 

Wong: Transparency and updates can be provided in a better fashion. You can email me directly. If you have a comment and a question, you can reach me directly and that's the kind of transparency I can provide. 

Wadhwa: My answer is dramatic. I would bring the public in the priority setting process of the districts' schools. We must get a process set up where the citizens are comfortable to give their input and time to help the board solve the inevitable problems. 

In the recent NJ Monthly rankings Millburn township's school dropped from first place to eighth place. To what degree are you concerned and knowing that most taxpayers are concerned what do you foresee as potential solutions?

Cahn: It may be true that scores remained high even though class sizes went up but perception is reality. People who are considering a move to New Jersey look at these rankings. Our drop in ranking has given perspective residents a possible reason not to consider Millburn. They may look at higher rated districts.

Wong: The percentages of teachers who have higher degrees are measured. So when we select our teachers as we hire them we should be looking to recruit and hire more teachers with higher degrees. We should look at the policy of opening AP to more people. 

Wadhwa: I'm concerned because my community is. And if I'm to represent them I need to learn more about this and be concerned. These rating are skin deep. The criteria changes every year. They simply don't tell the achievement story. I would encourage the board to look deeper to how student achievement scores are across all students. 

Siegel: We should always be concerned about our school's performance and we should always strive to do more and improve but what's being lost in this entire discussion are the hard facts. Our school scores have improved in every academic metric. Those stating otherwise are doing a diservice to our community, are not understanding the facts and frankly are a bit naive. 

What goals do you hope to realize if you are elected? 

Wong: The goals that I have are very simple. One, we should have a fiscally prudent budget. Two, we need to protect our assets. Three, we need to improve the relationship between the board and the public. 

Wadhwa: My first priority is to assure our schools gain the legendary reputation of being ahead of all the other schools and not only today but in the future. For this we need to be aware of the changing economy, globalization and the skill sets need for the job market in the future. 

Siegel: My goal is to continue the pursuit of highest academic achievement. but it has to be tempered with the fiscal responsibilities of reality. My goal is to increase the use of technology to educational experience at all levels. This will allow us to have more differential learning inside the classroom. 

Cahn: Board relations. Get a better comradery amongst all Board of Ed members so that productive fruitful discussion about the school district's future can take place. Budget priority must line up with long-term goals. Listen to the community and insist on keeping that dialogue positive polite productive and on going. Focus on student achievement. 

Read more later about public and candidate questions.

There will be a second forum next Thursday, Oct. 25 at 7:30 p.m. in the Education Center, hosted by M-SPEC. The board election will be on the ballot on Election Day, Tuesday, Nov. 6.

Did you miss the forum, what would you like to ask the candidates? Tell us in the comments!

Susan1 October 22, 2012 at 02:02 PM
I find it highly suspicious that the three challengers are running together. Why do their signs stand in groups of three? Did they even know each other before the election?
Hedley October 22, 2012 at 04:07 PM
If they are running as a block, they should say so, so that voters can evaluate their affiliations and "new ideas."
Hedley October 22, 2012 at 04:09 PM
If the challengers are acting/running as a group, shouldn't they be evaluated in the same fashion as you wish to evaluate Seigel - based on his perceived group?
Serta October 23, 2012 at 04:21 AM
You cannot be seriously following the BoE. They lump themseves together to form a dominant majority. Give me one example of independence through his voting record of this self-described independent incumbant? You are the one with all the platitudes and empty talk. Voting records speak volumes. As for the next President, JKH prefers fence sitters to those who walk their talk. Please Patch readers, get informed. Vote responsibly on November 6th.
Susan1 October 23, 2012 at 11:08 PM
Yes, Serta, it is important to vote responsibly on November 6th. But for some of us, voting for a block of three candidates just for the sake of change isn't responsible at all. I have not heard you say one positive thing about any of them; just attacks against the current BOE members. What was that quote above? "People step up to volunteer their time to serve our community and you give 'em a full dose of your vitriole and disrespect." Oh wait, that was YOU. The incumbent member on the ballot has done just that - volunteered his time to serve his community. Vote for whomever you choose, but stop calling them ducks. They're members of our community.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »